[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 20/26] x86: Fix x86_cpu_new() error handling
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v3 20/26] x86: Fix x86_cpu_new() error handling |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Jul 2020 10:59:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 |
On 02/07/20 06:51, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Igor, Paolo, you showed me the error in v2. Could you have a look at
> this revision?
>
> Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com> writes:
>
>> The Error ** argument must be NULL, &error_abort, &error_fatal, or a
>> pointer to a variable containing NULL. Passing an argument of the
>> latter kind twice without clearing it in between is wrong: if the
>> first call sets an error, it no longer points to NULL for the second
>> call.
>>
>> x86_cpu_new() is wrong that way: it passes &local_err to
>> object_property_set_uint() without checking it, and then to
>> qdev_realize(). If both fail, we'll trip error_setv()'s assertion.
>> To assess the bug's impact, we'd need to figure out how to make both
>> calls fail. Too much work for ignorant me, sorry.
>>
>> Fix by checking for failure right away.
>>
>> Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
>> Cc: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
>> ---
>> hw/i386/x86.c | 8 +++++---
>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/i386/x86.c b/hw/i386/x86.c
>> index 34229b45c7..93f7371a56 100644
>> --- a/hw/i386/x86.c
>> +++ b/hw/i386/x86.c
>> @@ -118,14 +118,16 @@ uint32_t x86_cpu_apic_id_from_index(X86MachineState
>> *x86ms,
>>
>> void x86_cpu_new(X86MachineState *x86ms, int64_t apic_id, Error **errp)
>> {
>> - Object *cpu = NULL;
>> Error *local_err = NULL;
>> -
>> - cpu = object_new(MACHINE(x86ms)->cpu_type);
>> + Object *cpu = object_new(MACHINE(x86ms)->cpu_type);
>>
>> object_property_set_uint(cpu, apic_id, "apic-id", &local_err);
>> + if (local_err) {
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> qdev_realize(DEVICE(cpu), NULL, &local_err);
>>
>> +out:
>> object_unref(cpu);
>> error_propagate(errp, local_err);
>> }
>
Yes, this looks good. Thanks!
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Paolo