[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Jun 2020 10:53:23 -0400 |
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 12:27:58PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> virtio-fs devices are only specified for virtio-1, so it is unclear
> how a legacy or transitional device should behave.
>
> Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> Forcing off legacy now (after the virtio-fs device has already been
> available) may have unintended consequences, therefore RFC.
>
> By default, a virtio-pci device uses 'AUTO' for disable_legacy, which
> will resolve to different values based upon which bus the device has
> been plugged. Therefore, forcing disable_legacy may result in the same
> device or a quite different one.
>
> Even though pre-virtio-1 behaviour of virtio-fs devices is simply not
> specified, toggling disable_legacy will have implications for the BAR
> layout, IIRC, and therefore a guest might end up getting a different
> device, even if it always used it with virtio-1 anyway.
>
> Not sure what the best way to solve this problem is. Adding a compat
> property for disable_legacy=AUTO may be the right thing to do, but I'm
> not quite clear if there are any further implications here.
Well I notice that this device is not migrateable.
So I think that we can just switch it over and be done with it.
> Whatever we do here, we should make sure that the ccw incarnation of
> this device indeed forces virtio-1.
I agree. I notice that the API virtio_pci_force_virtio_1 turned out
to be too fragile. I propose that instead we have a whitelist of
devices which can be legacy or transitional. Force rest to modern.
> ---
> hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c
> index e11c889d82b3..244205edf765 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-user-fs-pci.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ static void vhost_user_fs_pci_realize(VirtIOPCIProxy
> *vpci_dev, Error **errp)
> vpci_dev->nvectors = dev->vdev.conf.num_request_queues + 2;
> }
>
> + virtio_pci_force_virtio_1(vpci_dev);
> qdev_realize(vdev, BUS(&vpci_dev->bus), errp);
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.4
- [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage, Cornelia Huck, 2020/06/29
- Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
- Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage, Cornelia Huck, 2020/06/29
- Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2020/06/29
- Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage, Cornelia Huck, 2020/06/30
- Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2020/06/30
- Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage, Cornelia Huck, 2020/06/30
- Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage, Michael S. Tsirkin, 2020/06/30
- Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2020/06/29
- Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-fs: force virtio 1.x usage, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2020/06/30