Re: [PATCH 0/2] tests/qtest/fuzz: Avoid QTest serialization

[Alexander Bulekov]

On 200526 1105, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 5/26/20 10:56 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 07:58:18AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> Hi Alexander,
> >>
> >> I forgot to share these 2 patches wrote before
> >> the direct MemoryRegion fuzzer sent yesterday.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Phil.
> >>
> >> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2):
> >>   tests/qtest/fuzz: Avoid QTest ioport serialization
> >>   tests/qtest/fuzz: Avoid QTest mmio serialization
> >>
> >>  tests/qtest/fuzz/i440fx_fuzz.c      | 19 +++++++++++++------
> >>  tests/qtest/fuzz/virtio_net_fuzz.c  |  6 ++++--
> >>  tests/qtest/fuzz/virtio_scsi_fuzz.c |  6 +++++-
> >>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > Will it still be possible to print qtest reproducer commands when a
> > crash is found?
> 
> Yes, there is no change in the corpus format.

Yes, though with these patches, the qtest-based code will be gone.
Should there be some option to switch between the two modes?

> > 
> > Other than this concern, higher fuzzing rates would be great.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Phil.