Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] megasas: use unsigned type for reply_queue_head and check index

[Alexander Bulekov]

Hi Prasad,
On 200514 0055, P J P wrote:
> From: Prasad J Pandit <address@hidden>
> 
> A guest user may set 'reply_queue_head' field of MegasasState to
> a negative value. Later in 'megasas_lookup_frame' it is used to
> index into s->frames[] array. Use unsigned type to avoid OOB
> access issue.
> 
> Also check that 'index' value stays within s->frames[] bounds
> through the while() loop in 'megasas_lookup_frame' to avoid OOB
> access.
> 
> Reported-by: Ren Ding <address@hidden>
> Reported-by: Hanqing Zhao <address@hidden>
> Reported-by: Alexander Bulekov <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit <address@hidden>
> ---

Acked-by: Alexander Bulekov <address@hidden>

I applied these patches and could not reproduce the heap-overflow, or
LP1878259

Thanks
-Alex

>  hw/scsi/megasas.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Update v1 -> v2: fix OOB access when index > MEGASAS_MAX_FRAMES(=2048)
>  -> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-05/msg03131.html
> 
> diff --git a/hw/scsi/megasas.c b/hw/scsi/megasas.c
> index af18c88b65..6ce598cd69 100644
> --- a/hw/scsi/megasas.c
> +++ b/hw/scsi/megasas.c
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ typedef struct MegasasState {
>      uint64_t reply_queue_pa;
>      void *reply_queue;
>      int reply_queue_len;
> -    int reply_queue_head;
> +    uint16_t reply_queue_head;
>      int reply_queue_tail;
>      uint64_t consumer_pa;
>      uint64_t producer_pa;
> @@ -445,7 +445,7 @@ static MegasasCmd *megasas_lookup_frame(MegasasState *s,
>  
>      index = s->reply_queue_head;
>  
> -    while (num < s->fw_cmds) {
> +    while (num < s->fw_cmds && index < MEGASAS_MAX_FRAMES) {
>          if (s->frames[index].pa && s->frames[index].pa == frame) {
>              cmd = &s->frames[index];
>              break;
> -- 
> 2.25.4
>