[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PATCH v4 6/6] net/colo-compare.c: Correct ordering in complete and
From: |
Zhang, Chen |
Subject: |
RE: [PATCH v4 6/6] net/colo-compare.c: Correct ordering in complete and finalize |
Date: |
Thu, 7 May 2020 13:26:11 +0000 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lukas Straub <address@hidden>
> Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 6:28 PM
> To: qemu-devel <address@hidden>
> Cc: Zhang, Chen <address@hidden>; Li Zhijian
> <address@hidden>; Jason Wang <address@hidden>; Marc-
> André Lureau <address@hidden>; Paolo Bonzini
> <address@hidden>
> Subject: [PATCH v4 6/6] net/colo-compare.c: Correct ordering in complete
> and finalize
>
> In colo_compare_complete, insert CompareState into net_compares only
> after everything has been initialized.
> In colo_compare_finalize, remove CompareState from net_compares before
> anything is deinitialized.
S/deinitialized/finalized
It looks no dependences on each step on initialization and finalization.
Do you means we just need add/remove each colo-compare module at last in logic?
Or current code have some issue?
Thanks
Zhang Chen
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Straub <address@hidden>
> ---
> net/colo-compare.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/colo-compare.c b/net/colo-compare.c index
> c7572d75e9..6f80bcece6 100644
> --- a/net/colo-compare.c
> +++ b/net/colo-compare.c
> @@ -1283,15 +1283,6 @@ static void
> colo_compare_complete(UserCreatable *uc, Error **errp)
> s->vnet_hdr);
> }
>
> - qemu_mutex_lock(&colo_compare_mutex);
> - if (!colo_compare_active) {
> - qemu_mutex_init(&event_mtx);
> - qemu_cond_init(&event_complete_cond);
> - colo_compare_active = true;
> - }
> - QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&net_compares, s, next);
> - qemu_mutex_unlock(&colo_compare_mutex);
> -
> s->out_sendco.s = s;
> s->out_sendco.chr = &s->chr_out;
> s->out_sendco.notify_remote_frame = false; @@ -1312,6 +1303,16 @@
> static void colo_compare_complete(UserCreatable *uc, Error **errp)
> connection_destroy);
>
> colo_compare_iothread(s);
> +
> + qemu_mutex_lock(&colo_compare_mutex);
> + if (!colo_compare_active) {
> + qemu_mutex_init(&event_mtx);
> + qemu_cond_init(&event_complete_cond);
> + colo_compare_active = true;
> + }
> + QTAILQ_INSERT_TAIL(&net_compares, s, next);
> + qemu_mutex_unlock(&colo_compare_mutex);
> +
> return;
> }
>
> @@ -1384,19 +1385,6 @@ static void colo_compare_finalize(Object *obj)
> CompareState *s = COLO_COMPARE(obj);
> CompareState *tmp = NULL;
>
> - qemu_chr_fe_deinit(&s->chr_pri_in, false);
> - qemu_chr_fe_deinit(&s->chr_sec_in, false);
> - qemu_chr_fe_deinit(&s->chr_out, false);
> - if (s->notify_dev) {
> - qemu_chr_fe_deinit(&s->chr_notify_dev, false);
> - }
> -
> - if (s->iothread) {
> - colo_compare_timer_del(s);
> - }
> -
> - qemu_bh_delete(s->event_bh);
> -
> qemu_mutex_lock(&colo_compare_mutex);
> QTAILQ_FOREACH(tmp, &net_compares, next) {
> if (tmp == s) {
> @@ -1411,6 +1399,19 @@ static void colo_compare_finalize(Object *obj)
> }
> qemu_mutex_unlock(&colo_compare_mutex);
>
> + qemu_chr_fe_deinit(&s->chr_pri_in, false);
> + qemu_chr_fe_deinit(&s->chr_sec_in, false);
> + qemu_chr_fe_deinit(&s->chr_out, false);
> + if (s->notify_dev) {
> + qemu_chr_fe_deinit(&s->chr_notify_dev, false);
> + }
> +
> + if (s->iothread) {
> + colo_compare_timer_del(s);
> + }
> +
> + qemu_bh_delete(s->event_bh);
> +
> AioContext *ctx = iothread_get_aio_context(s->iothread);
> aio_context_acquire(ctx);
> AIO_WAIT_WHILE(ctx, !s->out_sendco.done);
> --
> 2.20.1
- RE: [PATCH v4 5/6] net/colo-compare.c, softmmu/vl.c: Check that colo-compare is active, (continued)
- RE: [PATCH v4 5/6] net/colo-compare.c, softmmu/vl.c: Check that colo-compare is active, Zhang, Chen, 2020/05/07
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] net/colo-compare.c, softmmu/vl.c: Check that colo-compare is active, Lukas Straub, 2020/05/07
- RE: [PATCH v4 5/6] net/colo-compare.c, softmmu/vl.c: Check that colo-compare is active, Zhang, Chen, 2020/05/07
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] net/colo-compare.c, softmmu/vl.c: Check that colo-compare is active, Derek Su, 2020/05/07
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] net/colo-compare.c, softmmu/vl.c: Check that colo-compare is active, Lukas Straub, 2020/05/08
- RE: [PATCH v4 5/6] net/colo-compare.c, softmmu/vl.c: Check that colo-compare is active, Zhang, Chen, 2020/05/08
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] net/colo-compare.c, softmmu/vl.c: Check that colo-compare is active, Lukas Straub, 2020/05/09
- RE: [PATCH v4 5/6] net/colo-compare.c, softmmu/vl.c: Check that colo-compare is active, Zhang, Chen, 2020/05/11
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] net/colo-compare.c, softmmu/vl.c: Check that colo-compare is active, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2020/05/12
[PATCH v4 6/6] net/colo-compare.c: Correct ordering in complete and finalize, Lukas Straub, 2020/05/04
- RE: [PATCH v4 6/6] net/colo-compare.c: Correct ordering in complete and finalize,
Zhang, Chen <=
RE: [PATCH v4 0/6] colo-compare bugfixes, Zhang, Chen, 2020/05/15