Re: [PATCH 1/4] softfloat: silence sNaN for conversions to/from floatx80

[Richard Henderson]

On 5/1/20 9:17 AM, Alex Bennée wrote:
> Ideally we want to
> convert the extF80 and f128 code to use the newer FloatParts code which
> is pretty robustly tested now. However the trick would be finding a way
> to do that that doesn't involve break or regressing the performance for
> the f16/32/64 cases. Just using a union causes all sorts of problems.

Yep.  Doing this conversion is the only way we'll ever fix the issue that
Joseph points out for the difference between m68k and i686 fp format.

> Anyway I'd settle for fixing the old style code and enabling the tests
> we can.

Yep.


r~