qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PULL 0/5] Tracing patches


From: Alex Bennée
Subject: Re: [PULL 0/5] Tracing patches
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 15:25:03 +0000
User-agent: mu4e 1.3.7; emacs 27.0.60

Peter Maydell <address@hidden> writes:

> On Thu, 30 Jan 2020 at 21:38, Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> The following changes since commit 928173659d6e5dc368284f73f90ea1d129e1f57d:
>>
>>   Merge remote-tracking branch 
>> 'remotes/pmaydell/tags/pull-target-arm-20200130' into staging (2020-01-30 
>> 16:19:04 +0000)
>>
>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>
>>   https://github.com/stefanha/qemu.git tags/tracing-pull-request
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to e144a605a614d22165000c69e8e1dc6986d45cd8:
>>
>>   qemu_set_log_filename: filename argument may be NULL (2020-01-30 21:33:50 
>> +0000)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Pull request
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Peter Maydell (3):
>>   docs/devel/tracing.txt: Recommend only
>>     trace_event_get_state_backends()
>>   memory.c: Use trace_event_get_state_backends()
>>   hw/display/qxl.c: Use trace_event_get_state_backends()
>>
>> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (1):
>>   Makefile: Keep trace-events-subdirs ordered
>>
>> Salvador Fandino (1):
>>   qemu_set_log_filename: filename argument may be NULL
>
> Here's a weird one -- with this pullreq applied I
> see a new warning running check-tcg on the linux-user
> static config build:
>
>   TEST    linux-test on aarch64
>   TEST    testthread on aarch64
>   TEST    float_madds on aarch64
>   DIFF    float_madds.out with
> /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/tests/tcg/aarch64/float_ma
> dds.ref
>   TEST    fcvt on aarch64
> warning: TCG temporary leaks before 0000000000400a0c
>   DIFF    fcvt.out with
> /home/petmay01/linaro/qemu-for-merges/tests/tcg/aarch64/fcvt.ref
>   TEST    pauth-1 on aarch64
>   TEST    pauth-2 on aarch64
>
> but I'm not sure why any of the patches here would have
> provoked that, unless they're now causing a log message
> that would previously have been suppressed or directed
> somewhere else to be emitted.

That must be it - before hand we wouldn't have called
qemu_set_log_filename which in turn doesn't call qemu_set_log.

Anyway I have replicated the warning.

>
> thanks
> -- PMM


-- 
Alex Bennée



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]