qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v5 02/41] target/arm: Enable HCR_E2H for VHE


From: Peter Maydell
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 02/41] target/arm: Enable HCR_E2H for VHE
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2020 13:06:23 +0000

On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 23:56, Richard Henderson
<address@hidden> wrote:
>
> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson <address@hidden>
> ---
>  target/arm/cpu.h    | 7 -------
>  target/arm/helper.c | 6 +++++-
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> index 0477cef1ea..239c9eb783 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> @@ -1417,13 +1417,6 @@ static inline void xpsr_write(CPUARMState *env, 
> uint32_t val, uint32_t mask)
>  #define HCR_ATA       (1ULL << 56)
>  #define HCR_DCT       (1ULL << 57)
>
> -/*
> - * When we actually implement ARMv8.1-VHE we should add HCR_E2H to
> - * HCR_MASK and then clear it again if the feature bit is not set in
> - * hcr_write().
> - */
> -#define HCR_MASK      ((1ULL << 34) - 1)
> -
>  #define SCR_NS                (1U << 0)
>  #define SCR_IRQ               (1U << 1)
>  #define SCR_FIQ               (1U << 2)
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 19a57a17da..f5ce05fdf3 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -4721,7 +4721,8 @@ static const ARMCPRegInfo el3_no_el2_v8_cp_reginfo[] = {
>  static void hcr_write(CPUARMState *env, const ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t 
> value)
>  {
>      ARMCPU *cpu = env_archcpu(env);
> -    uint64_t valid_mask = HCR_MASK;
> +    /* Begin with bits defined in base ARMv8.0.  */
> +    uint64_t valid_mask = MAKE_64BIT_MASK(0, 34);
>
>      if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_EL3)) {
>          valid_mask &= ~HCR_HCD;
> @@ -4735,6 +4736,9 @@ static void hcr_write(CPUARMState *env, const 
> ARMCPRegInfo *ri, uint64_t value)
>           */
>          valid_mask &= ~HCR_TSC;
>      }
> +    if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_vh, cpu)) {
> +        valid_mask |= HCR_E2H;
> +    }
>      if (cpu_isar_feature(aa64_lor, cpu)) {
>          valid_mask |= HCR_TLOR;
>      }

Should HCR_E2H be in the list of bits for which we do
a tlb_flush () in hcr_write()? (Currently we do this for
VM, PTW and DC.) Given some of the later TLB-flushing
changes have code that is "we only need to flush these
TLB indexes when this register is written if E2H==1",
it makes it easier to be sure we have the right behaviour
if we don't need to think through scenarios of "write
to the register, then set E2H==1"...

thanks
-- PMM



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]