On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 9:35 AM Mark Cave-Ayland <
address@hidden> wrote:
On 31/01/2020 08:03, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Thank you for testing the two patches. I will wait a few days to see if Zoltán wants to write a cleaned up patch. Otherwise I'll try to write a patch that's acceptable for submission.
>
> I'm busy collecting pending audio fixes for the next pull req,
> planned to send out early next week. Would be cool if I can
> include a coreaudio fix ;)
>
> The RFC patch looks sane to me but it clearly needs a better
> commit message.
>
> Current patch queue state:
> https://git.kraxel.org/cgit/qemu/log/?h=queue/audio
>
> If I missed something please resend.
That would be great! One thing to note is that Volker's RFC patch applies on top of
Zoltan's original diff from
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-01/msg02142.html rather than
being standalone.
If you take a look at my branch at https://github.com/mcayland/qemu/commits/for-cat7
then it's just a case of squashing the top 2 commits and coming up with a suitable
commit message.
ATB,
Mark.
Yes, lovely!
I just applied the dsound patch from KJ Liew on top of the for-cat7 branch.
While it will not apply directly (not finding the file to patch in the source tree), it nevertheless gets rid of the dsound errors too.
Best,
Howard