[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/5] target/s390x: Do not leak stack address in translate_one
|
From: |
Cornelia Huck |
|
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/5] target/s390x: Do not leak stack address in translate_one |
|
Date: |
Fri, 24 Jan 2020 15:25:09 +0100 |
On Fri, 24 Jan 2020 10:43:32 +0100
Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 24/01/2020 00.22, Richard Henderson wrote:
> > Thomas' patch avoids the leak, but I think we can do a bit more to
> > cleaning in this area, and move the structure inline to DisasContext.
> >
> Sounds like a good idea to me. Cornelia, could you please replace my
> patch with Richard's series?
Yes, that sounds good. Dropped your patch in favour of this series.
- Re: [PATCH 1/5] target/s390x: Move struct DisasFields definition earlier, (continued)
- [PATCH 2/5] target/s390x: Remove DisasFields argument from callbacks, Richard Henderson, 2020/01/23
- [PATCH 5/5] target/s390x: Remove DisasFields argument from extract_insn, Richard Henderson, 2020/01/23
- [PATCH 4/5] target/s390x: Move DisasFields into DisasContext, Richard Henderson, 2020/01/23
- [PATCH 3/5] target/s390x: Pass DisasContext to get_field and have_field, Richard Henderson, 2020/01/23
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] target/s390x: Do not leak stack address in translate_one, Thomas Huth, 2020/01/24
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] target/s390x: Do not leak stack address in translate_one,
Cornelia Huck <=
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] target/s390x: Do not leak stack address in translate_one, Cornelia Huck, 2020/01/24