[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[PATCH v4 03/11] 9pfs: validate count sent by client with T_readdir
From: |
Christian Schoenebeck |
Subject: |
[PATCH v4 03/11] 9pfs: validate count sent by client with T_readdir |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:50:33 +0100 |
A good 9p client sends T_readdir with "count" parameter that's sufficiently
smaller than client's initially negotiated msize (maximum message size).
We perform a check for that though to avoid the server to be interrupted
with a "Failed to encode VirtFS reply type 41" transport error message by
bad clients. This count value constraint uses msize - 11, because 11 is the
header size of R_readdir.
Signed-off-by: Christian Schoenebeck <address@hidden>
---
hw/9pfs/9p.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/hw/9pfs/9p.c b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
index a5fbe821d4..18370183c4 100644
--- a/hw/9pfs/9p.c
+++ b/hw/9pfs/9p.c
@@ -2426,6 +2426,7 @@ static void coroutine_fn v9fs_readdir(void *opaque)
int32_t count;
uint32_t max_count;
V9fsPDU *pdu = opaque;
+ V9fsState *s = pdu->s;
retval = pdu_unmarshal(pdu, offset, "dqd", &fid,
&initial_offset, &max_count);
@@ -2434,6 +2435,13 @@ static void coroutine_fn v9fs_readdir(void *opaque)
}
trace_v9fs_readdir(pdu->tag, pdu->id, fid, initial_offset, max_count);
+ if (max_count > s->msize - 11) {
+ max_count = s->msize - 11;
+ warn_report_once(
+ "9p: bad client: T_readdir with count > msize - 11"
+ );
+ }
+
fidp = get_fid(pdu, fid);
if (fidp == NULL) {
retval = -EINVAL;
--
2.20.1
- Re: [PATCH v4 07/11] tests/virtio-9p: failing splitted readdir test, (continued)
[PATCH v4 06/11] tests/virtio-9p: added splitted readdir test, Christian Schoenebeck, 2020/01/20
Re: [PATCH v4 06/11] tests/virtio-9p: added splitted readdir test, Greg Kurz, 2020/01/22
[PATCH v4 03/11] 9pfs: validate count sent by client with T_readdir,
Christian Schoenebeck <=
[PATCH v4 08/11] 9pfs: readdir benchmark, Christian Schoenebeck, 2020/01/20