qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] tests: acpi: update path in rebuild-expected-aml


From: Michael S. Tsirkin
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: acpi: update path in rebuild-expected-aml
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 08:45:30 -0500

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 11:01:44AM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Thomas Huth [mailto:address@hidden]
> > Sent: 14 January 2020 17:08
> > To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <address@hidden>;
> > address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden
> > Cc: xuwei (O) <address@hidden>; Linuxarm <address@hidden>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] tests: acpi: update path in rebuild-expected-aml
> > 
> > On 14/01/2020 17.51, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > > Since commit 1e8a1fae7464("test: Move qtests to a separate
> > > directory") qtests are now placed in a separate folder and
> > > this breaks the script used to rebuild the expected ACPI
> > > tables for bios-tables-test. Update the script with correct
> > > path.
> > >
> > > Fixes: 1e8a1fae7464("test: Move qtests to a separate directory")
> > > Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/data/acpi/rebuild-expected-aml.sh | 6 +++---
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/data/acpi/rebuild-expected-aml.sh
> > b/tests/data/acpi/rebuild-expected-aml.sh
> > > index f89d4624bc..d44e511533 100755
> > > --- a/tests/data/acpi/rebuild-expected-aml.sh
> > > +++ b/tests/data/acpi/rebuild-expected-aml.sh
> > > @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
> > >
> > >  qemu_bins="x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64
> > aarch64-softmmu/qemu-system-aarch64"
> > >
> > > -if [ ! -e "tests/bios-tables-test" ]; then
> > > +if [ ! -e "tests/qtest/bios-tables-test" ]; then
> > >      echo "Test: bios-tables-test is required! Run make check before this
> > script."
> > >      echo "Run this script from the build directory."
> > >      exit 1;
> > > @@ -26,11 +26,11 @@ for qemu in $qemu_bins; do
> > >          echo "Also, run this script from the build directory."
> > >          exit 1;
> > >      fi
> > > -    TEST_ACPI_REBUILD_AML=y QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=$qemu
> > tests/bios-tables-test
> > > +    TEST_ACPI_REBUILD_AML=y QTEST_QEMU_BINARY=$qemu
> > tests/qtest/bios-tables-test
> > >  done
> > >
> > >  eval `grep SRC_PATH= config-host.mak`
> > >
> > > -echo '/* List of comma-separated changed AML files to ignore */' >
> > ${SRC_PATH}/tests/bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h
> > > +echo '/* List of comma-separated changed AML files to ignore */' >
> > ${SRC_PATH}/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h
> > >
> > >  echo "The files were rebuilt and can be added to git."
> > 
> > Oh, sorry for missing that in my patch series ... is there maybe a way
> > that we could test this script in one of our CI pipelines so that it is
> > not so easy to miss?
> 
> Right. That will be a useful one.
> 
> I am also seeing another error when I run "make check-qtest" on x86_64.
> This doesn’t seems to be related to the recent changes. I have gone back
> to 4.1.0 and it is still there.
> 
>   TEST    check-qtest-x86_64: tests/boot-order-test
>   TEST    check-qtest-x86_64: tests/bios-tables-test
> Could not access KVM kernel module: No such file or directory
> qemu-system-x86_64: failed to initialize KVM: No such file or directory
> qemu-system-x86_64: Back to tcg accelerator
> Could not access KVM kernel module: No such file or directory
> qemu-system-x86_64: failed to initialize KVM: No such file or directory
> qemu-system-x86_64: Back to tcg accelerator
> Could not access KVM kernel module: No such file or directory
> qemu-system-x86_64: failed to initialize KVM: No such file or directory
> qemu-system-x86_64: Back to tcg accelerator
> acpi-test: Warning! FACP binary file mismatch. Actual [aml:/tmp/aml-2Q9EE0], 
> Expected [aml:tests/data/acpi/pc/FACP.bridge].
> acpi-test: Warning! FACP mismatch. Actual [asl:/tmp/asl-CQ9EE0.dsl, 
> aml:/tmp/aml-2Q9EE0], Expected [asl:/tmp/asl-N18EE0.dsl, 
> aml:tests/data/acpi/pc/FACP.bridge].
> **
> ERROR:tests/bios-tables-test.c:447:test_acpi_asl: assertion failed: 
> (all_tables_match)
> ERROR - Bail out! ERROR:tests/bios-tables-test.c:447:test_acpi_asl: assertion 
> failed: (all_tables_match)
> Aborted (core dumped)
> /home/shameer/qemu/tests/Makefile.include:899: recipe for target 
> 'check-qtest-x86_64' failed
> make: *** [check-qtest-x86_64] Error 1

Well make check seems to pass for me ... What's different for you?

> FACP seems to have changed and it looks like need to run the script to 
> generate
> a new one.
> 
> ~/qemu$ diff -u /tmp/asl-CQ9EE0.dsl /tmp/asl-N18EE0.dsl
> --- /tmp/asl-CQ9EE0.dsl 2020-01-15 10:52:03.018448627 +0000
> +++ /tmp/asl-N18EE0.dsl 2020-01-15 10:52:03.022448627 +0000
> @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
>   * AML/ASL+ Disassembler version 20180105 (64-bit version)
>   * Copyright (c) 2000 - 2018 Intel Corporation
>   *
> - * Disassembly of /tmp/aml-2Q9EE0, Wed Jan 15 10:52:03 2020
> + * Disassembly of tests/data/acpi/pc/FACP.bridge, Wed Jan 15 10:52:03 
> + 2020
>   *
>   * ACPI Data Table [FACP]
>   *
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
>  [000h 0000   4]                    Signature : "FACP"    [Fixed ACPI
> Description Table (FADT)]
>  [004h 0004   4]                 Table Length : 00000074
>  [008h 0008   1]                     Revision : 01
> -[009h 0009   1]                     Checksum : A1
> +[009h 0009   1]                     Checksum : D3
>  [00Ah 0010   6]                       Oem ID : "BOCHS "
>  [010h 0016   8]                 Oem Table ID : "BXPCFACP"
>  [018h 0024   4]                 Oem Revision : 00000001
> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
>  [069h 0105   1]             Duty Cycle Width : 00
>  [06Ah 0106   1]          RTC Day Alarm Index : 00
>  [06Bh 0107   1]        RTC Month Alarm Index : 00
> -[06Ch 0108   1]            RTC Century Index : 32
> +[06Ch 0108   1]            RTC Century Index : 00
>  [06Dh 0109   2]   Boot Flags (decoded below) : 0000
>                 Legacy Devices Supported (V2) : 0
>              8042 Present on ports 60/64 (V2) : 0 @@ -89,11 +89,11 @@
> 
> 
> Not sure this is an already reported one or I am missing something.
> Please let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> Shameer
> 
> > Anyway, for this patch:
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <address@hidden>
> 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]