RE: [PATCH RFC 01/12] migration: Add multiRDMA capability support

[fengzhimin]

Thanks for your review. I will change it in the next version(V2).

-----Original Message-----
From: Markus Armbruster [mailto:address@hidden] 
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2020 11:30 PM
To: fengzhimin <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden; address@hidden; 
address@hidden; Zhanghailiang <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 01/12] migration: Add multiRDMA capability support

Zhimin Feng <address@hidden> writes:

> From: fengzhimin <address@hidden>
>
> Signed-off-by: fengzhimin <address@hidden>
> ---
[...]
> diff --git a/qapi/migration.json b/qapi/migration.json index 
> b7348d0c8b..c995ffdc4c 100644
> --- a/qapi/migration.json
> +++ b/qapi/migration.json
> @@ -421,6 +421,8 @@
>  # @validate-uuid: Send the UUID of the source to allow the destination
>  #                 to ensure it is the same. (since 4.2)
>  #
> +# @multirdma: Use more than one channels for rdma migration. (since 
> +4.2) #
>  # Since: 1.2
>  ##
>  { 'enum': 'MigrationCapability',
> @@ -428,7 +430,7 @@
>             'compress', 'events', 'postcopy-ram', 'x-colo', 'release-ram',
>             'block', 'return-path', 'pause-before-switchover', 'multifd',
>             'dirty-bitmaps', 'postcopy-blocktime', 'late-block-activate',
> -           'x-ignore-shared', 'validate-uuid' ] }
> +           'x-ignore-shared', 'validate-uuid', 'multirdma' ] }
>  
>  ##
>  # @MigrationCapabilityStatus:

Spell it multi-rdma?