[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] vhost-vsock: delete vqs in vhost_vsock_unrealize to avoid me
From: |
Stefano Garzarella |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] vhost-vsock: delete vqs in vhost_vsock_unrealize to avoid memleaks |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:20:42 +0100 |
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 03:52:29PM +0800, address@hidden wrote:
> From: Pan Nengyuan <address@hidden>
>
> Receive/transmit/event vqs forgot to cleanup in vhost_vsock_unrealize. This
> patch save receive/transmit vq pointer in realize() and cleanup vqs
> through those vq pointers in unrealize(). The leak stack is as follow:
>
> Direct leak of 21504 byte(s) in 3 object(s) allocated from:
> #0 0x7f86a1356970 (/lib64/libasan.so.5+0xef970) ??:?
> #1 0x7f86a09aa49d (/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0+0x5249d) ??:?
> #2 0x5604852f85ca (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c3e5ca)
> /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:2333
> #3 0x560485356208 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c9c208)
> /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.c:339
> #4 0x560485305a17 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x2c4ba17)
> /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/virtio/virtio.c:3531
> #5 0x5604858e6b65 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x322cb65)
> /mnt/sdb/qemu/hw/core/qdev.c:865
> #6 0x5604861e6c41 (./x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64+0x3b2cc41)
> /mnt/sdb/qemu/qom/object.c:2102
>
> Reported-by: Euler Robot <address@hidden>
> Signed-off-by: Pan Nengyuan <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.c | 9 +++++++--
> include/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <address@hidden>
>
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.c b/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.c
> index f5744363a8..896c0174c1 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.c
> @@ -335,8 +335,10 @@ static void vhost_vsock_device_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> sizeof(struct virtio_vsock_config));
>
> /* Receive and transmit queues belong to vhost */
> - virtio_add_queue(vdev, VHOST_VSOCK_QUEUE_SIZE,
> vhost_vsock_handle_output);
> - virtio_add_queue(vdev, VHOST_VSOCK_QUEUE_SIZE,
> vhost_vsock_handle_output);
> + vsock->recv_vq = virtio_add_queue(vdev, VHOST_VSOCK_QUEUE_SIZE,
> + vhost_vsock_handle_output);
> + vsock->trans_vq = virtio_add_queue(vdev, VHOST_VSOCK_QUEUE_SIZE,
> + vhost_vsock_handle_output);
>
> /* The event queue belongs to QEMU */
> vsock->event_vq = virtio_add_queue(vdev, VHOST_VSOCK_QUEUE_SIZE,
> @@ -378,6 +380,9 @@ static void vhost_vsock_device_unrealize(DeviceState
> *dev, Error **errp)
> /* This will stop vhost backend if appropriate. */
> vhost_vsock_set_status(vdev, 0);
>
> + virtio_delete_queue(vsock->recv_vq);
> + virtio_delete_queue(vsock->trans_vq);
> + virtio_delete_queue(vsock->event_vq);
> vhost_dev_cleanup(&vsock->vhost_dev);
> virtio_cleanup(vdev);
> }
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.h b/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.h
> index d509d67c4a..bc5a988ee5 100644
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.h
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/vhost-vsock.h
> @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ typedef struct {
> struct vhost_virtqueue vhost_vqs[2];
> struct vhost_dev vhost_dev;
> VirtQueue *event_vq;
> + VirtQueue *recv_vq;
> + VirtQueue *trans_vq;
> QEMUTimer *post_load_timer;
>
> /*< public >*/
> --
> 2.21.0.windows.1
>
>
>
--