qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] dp8393x: Clean up endianness hacks


From: Finn Thain
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] dp8393x: Clean up endianness hacks
Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2020 11:21:24 +1100 (AEDT)

On Tue, 7 Jan 2020, Philippe Mathieu-Daud? wrote:

> On 1/6/20 11:19 PM, Finn Thain wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Finn Thain wrote:
> > 
> > > The in_use field is no different to the other words handled using
> > > dp8393x_put() and dp8393x_get(). Use the same technique for in_use
> > > that is used everywhere else.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Finn Thain <address@hidden>
> > > ---
> > > Changed since v1:
> > >   - Use existing 'address' variable rather than declare a new one.
> > > 
> > > Laurent tells me that this clean-up has been tried before. He referred
> > > me to commit c744cf7879 ("dp8393x: fix dp8393x_receive()") and
> > > commit 409b52bfe1 ("net/dp8393x: correctly reset in_use field").
> > > 
> > > Both of those patches look wrong to me because they both pass the wrong
> > > byte count to address_space_rw(). It's possible that those patches were
> > > needed to work around some kind of bug elsewhere, for example, an
> > > off-by-one result from dp8393x_crda(). The preceding patch in this series
> > > might help there.
> > 
> > Unfortunately this patch really does break NetBSD/arc 5.1, just as
> > Laurent said it would, just as commit c744cf7879 did.
> > 
> > Yet these patches are correct. What gives?
> > 
> > I found that one more change can make guests work (for both m68k q800 and
> > mips64el magnum machines) --
> > 
> > --- a/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> > +++ b/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> > @@ -246,8 +246,10 @@ static void dp8393x_put(dp8393xState *s, int width,
> > int offset,
> >                           uint16_t val)
> >   {
> >       if (s->big_endian) {
> > +          s->data[offset * width] = 0;
> >           s->data[offset * width + width - 1] = cpu_to_be16(val);
> >       } else {
> > +          s->data[offset * width + width - 1] = 0;
> >           s->data[offset * width] = cpu_to_le16(val);
> >       }
> >   }
> > 
> > For a wide bus interface, this forces the Most Significant Word (MSW) to
> > zero. Yet another endianness hack, but it makes NetBSD 5.1 'sn' driver
> > happy.
> 
> Can you write a list of real word addresses/values/result expected for each
> endianess, so we can add a qtest for this?
> 

I'm afraid I've no idea how qtests work. If you are talking about a unit 
test for dp8393x.c, this would be non-trivial because you need to have the 
SONIC in bus master mode (i.e. you have to get the chip to do some DMA).

The chip datasheet says,

    Data Bus: These bidirectional lines are used to transfer data on the 
    system bus. When the SONIC is a bus master, 16-bit data is transferred 
    on D15-D0 and 32-bit data is transferred on D31-D0. When the SONIC is 
    accessed as a slave, register data is driven onto lines D15-D0. 
    D31-D16 are held TRI-STATE if SONIC is in 16-bit mode. If SONIC is in 
    32-bit mode, they are driven, but invalid.

The datasheet does not explicitly state that D31-D16 are held low during a 
DMA write, it just says they are "not used". But I'm beginning to think 
that forcing the MSW to zero (see above) is the right thing to do.

> > There is a similar issue with the Linux jazzsonic driver. This driver uses
> > long-word-sized loads with word-sized MMIO registers --
> > 
> > #define SONIC_READ(reg) (*((volatile unsigned int *)dev->base_addr+reg))
> > 
> > This driver also expects the MSW to be zero. But the MSW actually equals
> > the LSW, and the driver fails to probe:
> > 
> > SONIC ethernet controller not found (0x40004)
> > 
> > This seems to indicate that qemu-system-mips64el -M magnum is doing word
> > smearing on the processor bus. Does anyone know how to prevent that?
> 
> I remember a similar issue with another MIPS board because QEMU doesn't model
> the bus controller, which might do such magic.
> 

The bus slave situation relates to e.g. the Silicon Revision register 
access. This is what breaks the Linux jazzsonic driver.

In that situation, the datasheet says that D31-D16 are "driven, but 
invalid". I think the right fix for that is,

--- a/hw/net/dp8393x.c
+++ b/hw/net/dp8393x.c
@@ -695,8 +695,8 @@ static void dp8393x_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, 
uint64_t data,
 static const MemoryRegionOps dp8393x_ops = {
     .read = dp8393x_read,
     .write = dp8393x_write,
-    .impl.min_access_size = 2,
-    .impl.max_access_size = 2,
+    .impl.min_access_size = 4,
+    .impl.max_access_size = 4,
     .endianness = DEVICE_NATIVE_ENDIAN,
 };

This change seems to fix Linux/mipsel and break Linux/m68k, even though 
both use the chip in 32-bit mode... I guess there's another endianness 
bug somewhere.

> > 
> > > ---
> > >   hw/net/dp8393x.c | 17 ++++++-----------
> > >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/hw/net/dp8393x.c b/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> > > index 1957bd391e..b2cc768d9b 100644
> > > --- a/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> > > +++ b/hw/net/dp8393x.c
> > > @@ -765,8 +765,6 @@ static ssize_t dp8393x_receive(NetClientState *nc,
> > > const uint8_t * buf,
> > >           return -1;
> > >       }
> > >   -    /* XXX: Check byte ordering */
> > > -
> > >       /* Check for EOL */
> > >       if (s->regs[SONIC_LLFA] & SONIC_DESC_EOL) {
> > >           /* Are we still in resource exhaustion? */
> > > @@ -836,15 +834,12 @@ static ssize_t dp8393x_receive(NetClientState *nc,
> > > const uint8_t * buf,
> > >           /* EOL detected */
> > >           s->regs[SONIC_ISR] |= SONIC_ISR_RDE;
> > >       } else {
> > > -        /* Clear in_use, but it is always 16bit wide */
> > > -        int offset = dp8393x_crda(s) + sizeof(uint16_t) * 6 * width;
> > > -        if (s->big_endian && width == 2) {
> > > -            /* we need to adjust the offset of the 16bit field */
> > > -            offset += sizeof(uint16_t);
> > > -        }
> > > -        s->data[0] = 0;
> > > -        address_space_rw(&s->as, offset, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED,
> > > -                         (uint8_t *)s->data, sizeof(uint16_t), 1);
> > > +        /* Clear in_use */
> > > +        address = dp8393x_crda(s) + sizeof(uint16_t) * 6 * width;
> > > +        size = sizeof(uint16_t) * width;
> > > +        dp8393x_put(s, width, 0, 0);
> > > +        address_space_rw(&s->as, address, MEMTXATTRS_UNSPECIFIED,
> > > +                         (uint8_t *)s->data, size, 1);
> > >           s->regs[SONIC_CRDA] = s->regs[SONIC_LLFA];
> > >           s->regs[SONIC_ISR] |= SONIC_ISR_PKTRX;
> > >           s->regs[SONIC_RSC] = (s->regs[SONIC_RSC] & 0xff00) |
> > > (((s->regs[SONIC_RSC] & 0x00ff) + 1) & 0x00ff);
> > > 
> > 
> 
> 



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]