qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 2/3] gitlab-ci.yml: Add a job to build EDK2 firmware binaries


From: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gitlab-ci.yml: Add a job to build EDK2 firmware binaries
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 12:35:50 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2

On 1/7/20 11:12 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
On 01/06/20 19:46, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
Add a GitLab job to build the EDK2 firmware binaries.
This job is only built when the roms/edk2/ submodule is updated,
when a git-ref starts with 'edk2' or when the last commit contains
'EDK2'.

keyword "or"; okay.


GitLab CI generates an artifacts.zip file containing the firmware
binaries.

With edk2-stable201905, the job took 40 minutes 26 seconds,
the artifacts.zip takes 10MiB.

Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden>
---
  .gitlab-ci-edk2.yml | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  .gitlab-ci.yml      |  3 +++
  MAINTAINERS         |  3 ++-
  3 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  create mode 100644 .gitlab-ci-edk2.yml

diff --git a/.gitlab-ci-edk2.yml b/.gitlab-ci-edk2.yml
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..abfaf52874
--- /dev/null
+++ b/.gitlab-ci-edk2.yml
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
+build-edk2:
+ rules: # Only run this job when ...
+ - changes: # ... roms/edk2/ is modified (submodule updated)
+   - roms/edk2/*
+   when: always
+ - if: '$CI_COMMIT_REF_NAME =~ /^edk2/' # ... the branch/tag starts with 'edk2'

(1) can you add "or" in the comment here?

+   when: always
+ - if: '$CI_COMMIT_MESSAGE =~ /edk2/i' # last commit description contains 
'EDK2'

(2) ditto

+   when: always
+ artifacts:
+   paths: # 'artifacts.zip' will contains the following files:
+   - pc-bios/edk2*bz2
+   - pc-bios/edk2-licenses.txt
+   - edk2-stdout.log
+   - edk2-stderr.log
+ image: ubuntu:16.04 # Use Ubuntu Xenial
+ before_script: # Install packages requiered to build EDK2
+ - apt-get update --quiet --quiet
+ - DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive
+   apt-get install --assume-yes --no-install-recommends --quiet --quiet
+     build-essential
+     ca-certificates
+     dos2unix
+     gcc-aarch64-linux-gnu
+     gcc-arm-linux-gnueabi
+     git
+     iasl
+     make
+     nasm
+     python
+     uuid-dev
+ script: # Clone the required submodules and build EDK2
+ - git submodule update --init roms/edk2

yes, this is needed; qemu users are used to updating top-level
submodules (which is why we didn't try to automate that away in the edk2
build stuff)

+ - git -C roms/edk2 submodule update --init

(3) but this should not be necessary. See the "submodules" target in
"roms/Makefile.edk2".

Hmm build fails without it:
https://gitlab.com/philmd/qemu/-/jobs/395644357#L436

The 'test -d edk2/.git' might be not enough?

+ - export JOBS=$(($(getconf _NPROCESSORS_ONLN) + 1))
+ - echo "=== Using ${JOBS} simultaneous jobs ==="
+ - make -j${JOBS} -C roms efi 1>edk2-stdout.log 2> >(tee -a edk2-stderr.log 
>&2)

Process substitution is a nifty feature, but perhaps we can do without
it, for simplicity. (I realize this is bash-only; I just like to
minimize the use of non-portable features if there is a portable
replacement that is also simple.)

Redirections are processed in the order they appear on the command line
[1], *after* stdout/stdin is redirected for pipelining [2]:

[1]
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_07

"If more than one redirection operator is specified with a command, the
order of evaluation is from beginning to end."

[2]
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html#tag_18_09_02

"The standard input, standard output, or both of a command shall be
considered to be assigned by the pipeline before any redirection
specified by redirection operators that are part of the command"


(4) Therefore, the following should work:

   make -j${JOBS} -C roms efi 2>&1 1>edk2-stdout.log \
   | tee -a edk2-stderr.log >&2

Untested, of course :)

This works like charm :>

Looks OK otherwise.

Thanks for the review!


Thanks!
Laszlo




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]