[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 02/10] ppc/pnv: Introduce a "system-memory" property
From: |
Greg Kurz |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 02/10] ppc/pnv: Introduce a "system-memory" property |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Dec 2019 17:01:56 +0100 |
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 08:29:53 +0100
Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden> wrote:
> and use a link to pass the system memory to the device models that
> require it to map/unmap BARs. This replace the use of get_system_memory()
>
> Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <address@hidden>
> ---
Globally good. A few remarks, see below.
> include/hw/ppc/pnv.h | 2 ++
> include/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.h | 1 +
> include/hw/ppc/pnv_xive.h | 2 ++
> hw/intc/pnv_xive.c | 5 ++++-
> hw/ppc/pnv.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 6 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
> index f78fd0dd967c..f31180618672 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,8 @@ typedef struct PnvChip {
> AddressSpace xscom_as;
>
> gchar *dt_isa_nodename;
> +
> + MemoryRegion *system_memory;
> } PnvChip;
>
> #define TYPE_PNV8_CHIP "pnv8-chip"
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.h
> index f0f5b5519767..f85babaff0be 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.h
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ typedef struct PnvPsi {
>
> MemoryRegion regs_mr;
> uint64_t bar;
> + MemoryRegion *system_memory;
>
> /* FSP region not supported */
> /* MemoryRegion fsp_mr; */
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xive.h b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xive.h
> index f4c7caad40ee..4d641db691c8 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xive.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/pnv_xive.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ typedef struct PnvXive {
> /* Owning chip */
> struct PnvChip *chip;
>
> + MemoryRegion *system_memory;
> +
> /* XSCOM addresses giving access to the controller registers */
> MemoryRegion xscom_regs;
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/pnv_xive.c b/hw/intc/pnv_xive.c
> index a0a69b98a713..66970a60733b 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/pnv_xive.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/pnv_xive.c
> @@ -853,7 +853,7 @@ static void pnv_xive_ic_reg_write(void *opaque, hwaddr
> offset,
> uint64_t val, unsigned size)
> {
> PnvXive *xive = PNV_XIVE(opaque);
> - MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
> + MemoryRegion *sysmem = xive->system_memory;
> uint32_t reg = offset >> 3;
> bool is_chip0 = xive->chip->chip_id == 0;
>
> @@ -1821,6 +1821,7 @@ static void pnv_xive_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
> **errp)
> Error *local_err = NULL;
>
> assert(xive->chip);
> + assert(xive->system_memory);
>
> /*
> * The XiveSource and XiveENDSource objects are realized with the
> @@ -1937,6 +1938,8 @@ static Property pnv_xive_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("tm-bar", PnvXive, tm_base, 0),
> /* The PnvChip id identifies the XIVE interrupt controller. */
> DEFINE_PROP_LINK("chip", PnvXive, chip, TYPE_PNV_CHIP, PnvChip *),
> + DEFINE_PROP_LINK("system-memory", PnvXive, system_memory,
> + TYPE_MEMORY_REGION, MemoryRegion *),
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> };
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv.c b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> index 855254f28263..2f611bfdda46 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv.c
> @@ -674,6 +674,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power10_pic_print_info(PnvChip
> *chip, Monitor *mon)
>
> static void pnv_init(MachineState *machine)
> {
> + MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
> PnvMachineState *pnv = PNV_MACHINE(machine);
> MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(machine);
> MemoryRegion *ram;
> @@ -692,7 +693,7 @@ static void pnv_init(MachineState *machine)
> ram = g_new(MemoryRegion, 1);
> memory_region_allocate_system_memory(ram, NULL, "pnv.ram",
> machine->ram_size);
> - memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), 0, ram);
> + memory_region_add_subregion(sysmem, 0, ram);
>
> /*
> * Create our simple PNOR device
> @@ -790,6 +791,12 @@ static void pnv_init(MachineState *machine)
> &error_fatal);
> object_property_set_int(chip, machine->smp.cores,
> "nr-cores", &error_fatal);
> + /*
> + * TODO: Only the MMIO range should be of interest for the
> + * controllers
> + */
> + object_property_set_link(chip, OBJECT(sysmem), "system-memory",
> + &error_abort);
Like it is done with PnvXive, it would be good to pair this with an
assert(chip->system_memory) in pnv_chip_realize().
> object_property_set_bool(chip, true, "realized", &error_fatal);
> }
> g_free(chip_typename);
> @@ -1060,6 +1067,8 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> /* Processor Service Interface (PSI) Host Bridge */
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&chip8->psi), PNV_PSIHB_BASE(chip),
> "bar", &error_fatal);
> + object_property_set_link(OBJECT(&chip8->psi),
> OBJECT(chip->system_memory),
> + "system-memory", &error_abort);
> object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&chip8->psi), true, "realized",
> &local_err);
> if (local_err) {
> error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> @@ -1100,7 +1109,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, PNV_XSCOM_OCC_BASE,
> &chip8->occ.xscom_regs);
>
> /* OCC SRAM model */
> - memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
> PNV_OCC_SENSOR_BASE(chip),
> + memory_region_add_subregion(chip->system_memory,
> PNV_OCC_SENSOR_BASE(chip),
> &chip8->occ.sram_regs);
>
> /* HOMER */
> @@ -1116,7 +1125,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power8_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, PNV_XSCOM_PBA_BASE,
> &chip8->homer.pba_regs);
>
> /* Homer mmio region */
> - memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), PNV_HOMER_BASE(chip),
> + memory_region_add_subregion(chip->system_memory, PNV_HOMER_BASE(chip),
> &chip8->homer.regs);
> }
>
> @@ -1280,6 +1289,8 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> "tm-bar", &error_fatal);
> object_property_set_link(OBJECT(&chip9->xive), OBJECT(chip), "chip",
> &error_abort);
> + object_property_set_link(OBJECT(&chip9->xive),
> OBJECT(chip->system_memory),
> + "system-memory", &error_abort);
> object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&chip9->xive), true, "realized",
> &local_err);
> if (local_err) {
> @@ -1292,6 +1303,8 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> /* Processor Service Interface (PSI) Host Bridge */
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&chip9->psi), PNV9_PSIHB_BASE(chip),
> "bar", &error_fatal);
> + object_property_set_link(OBJECT(&chip9->psi),
> OBJECT(chip->system_memory),
> + "system-memory", &error_abort);
> object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&chip9->psi), true, "realized",
> &local_err);
> if (local_err) {
> error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> @@ -1308,7 +1321,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> return;
> }
> - memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), PNV9_LPCM_BASE(chip),
> + memory_region_add_subregion(chip->system_memory, PNV9_LPCM_BASE(chip),
> &chip9->lpc.xscom_regs);
>
> chip->dt_isa_nodename = g_strdup_printf("/lpcm-opb@%" PRIx64 "/lpc@0",
> @@ -1325,7 +1338,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, PNV9_XSCOM_OCC_BASE,
> &chip9->occ.xscom_regs);
>
> /* OCC SRAM model */
> - memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(),
> PNV9_OCC_SENSOR_BASE(chip),
> + memory_region_add_subregion(chip->system_memory,
> PNV9_OCC_SENSOR_BASE(chip),
> &chip9->occ.sram_regs);
>
> /* HOMER */
> @@ -1341,7 +1354,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power9_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> pnv_xscom_add_subregion(chip, PNV9_XSCOM_PBA_BASE,
> &chip9->homer.pba_regs);
>
> /* Homer mmio region */
> - memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), PNV9_HOMER_BASE(chip),
> + memory_region_add_subregion(chip->system_memory, PNV9_HOMER_BASE(chip),
> &chip9->homer.regs);
> }
>
> @@ -1408,6 +1421,8 @@ static void pnv_chip_power10_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> /* Processor Service Interface (PSI) Host Bridge */
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(&chip10->psi), PNV10_PSIHB_BASE(chip),
> "bar", &error_fatal);
> + object_property_set_link(OBJECT(&chip10->psi),
> OBJECT(chip->system_memory),
> + "system-memory", &error_abort);
> object_property_set_bool(OBJECT(&chip10->psi), true, "realized",
> &local_err);
> if (local_err) {
> @@ -1426,7 +1441,7 @@ static void pnv_chip_power10_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> error_propagate(errp, local_err);
> return;
> }
> - memory_region_add_subregion(get_system_memory(), PNV10_LPCM_BASE(chip),
> + memory_region_add_subregion(chip->system_memory, PNV10_LPCM_BASE(chip),
> &chip10->lpc.xscom_regs);
>
> chip->dt_isa_nodename = g_strdup_printf("/lpcm-opb@%" PRIx64 "/lpc@0",
> @@ -1570,6 +1585,8 @@ static Property pnv_chip_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("ram-size", PnvChip, ram_size, 0),
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT32("nr-cores", PnvChip, nr_cores, 1),
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("cores-mask", PnvChip, cores_mask, 0x0),
> + DEFINE_PROP_LINK("system-memory", PnvChip, system_memory,
> + TYPE_MEMORY_REGION, MemoryRegion *),
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> };
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c b/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c
> index 75e20d9da08b..28d34e5c193a 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/pnv_psi.c
> @@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
> static void pnv_psi_set_bar(PnvPsi *psi, uint64_t bar)
> {
> PnvPsiClass *ppc = PNV_PSI_GET_CLASS(psi);
> - MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
> + MemoryRegion *sysmem = psi->system_memory;
> uint64_t old = psi->regs[PSIHB_XSCOM_BAR];
>
> psi->regs[PSIHB_XSCOM_BAR] = bar & (ppc->bar_mask | PSIHB_BAR_EN);
> @@ -489,6 +489,8 @@ static void pnv_psi_power8_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> Error *err = NULL;
> unsigned int i;
>
> + assert(psi->system_memory);
> +
This should theoretically sit in a realize function of the base
PnvPsi class. It doesn't exist but looking at the other duplicate
code in pnv_psi_power8_realize() and pnv_psi_power9_realize(),
eg. the reset handler, it seems it could be beneficial to
introduce one.
But this is far beyond the scope of this patch, so I guess
it is okay to keep the duplicate assert() for now.
> obj = object_property_get_link(OBJECT(dev), "xics", &err);
> if (!obj) {
> error_setg(errp, "%s: required link 'xics' not found: %s",
> @@ -562,6 +564,8 @@ static int pnv_psi_dt_xscom(PnvXScomInterface *dev, void
> *fdt, int xscom_offset)
> static Property pnv_psi_properties[] = {
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("bar", PnvPsi, bar, 0),
> DEFINE_PROP_UINT64("fsp-bar", PnvPsi, fsp_bar, 0),
> + DEFINE_PROP_LINK("system-memory", PnvPsi, system_memory,
> + TYPE_MEMORY_REGION, MemoryRegion *),
> DEFINE_PROP_END_OF_LIST(),
> };
>
> @@ -701,7 +705,7 @@ static void pnv_psi_p9_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr
> addr,
> PnvPsi *psi = PNV_PSI(opaque);
> Pnv9Psi *psi9 = PNV9_PSI(psi);
> uint32_t reg = PSIHB_REG(addr);
> - MemoryRegion *sysmem = get_system_memory();
> + MemoryRegion *sysmem = psi->system_memory;
>
> switch (addr) {
> case PSIHB9_CR:
> @@ -819,11 +823,12 @@ static void pnv_psi_power9_irq_set(PnvPsi *psi, int
> irq, bool state)
> static void pnv_psi_power9_reset(void *dev)
> {
> Pnv9Psi *psi = PNV9_PSI(dev);
> + MemoryRegion *sysmem = PNV_PSI(psi)->system_memory;
>
> pnv_psi_reset(dev);
>
> if (memory_region_is_mapped(&psi->source.esb_mmio)) {
> - memory_region_del_subregion(get_system_memory(),
> &psi->source.esb_mmio);
> + memory_region_del_subregion(sysmem, &psi->source.esb_mmio);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -842,6 +847,8 @@ static void pnv_psi_power9_realize(DeviceState *dev,
> Error **errp)
> Error *local_err = NULL;
> int i;
>
> + assert(psi->system_memory);
> +
> /* This is the only device with 4k ESB pages */
> object_property_set_int(OBJECT(xsrc), XIVE_ESB_4K, "shift",
> &error_fatal);
- [PATCH 00/10] ppc/pnv: remove the use of qdev_get_machine() and get_system_memory(), Cédric Le Goater, 2019/12/19
- [PATCH 01/10] ppc/pnv: Modify the powerdown notifier to get the PowerNV machine, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/12/19
- [PATCH 02/10] ppc/pnv: Introduce a "system-memory" property, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/12/19
- Re: [PATCH 02/10] ppc/pnv: Introduce a "system-memory" property,
Greg Kurz <=
- [PATCH 03/10] ppc/pnv: Introduce a "xics" property alias under the PSI model, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/12/19
- [PATCH 04/10] ppc/pnv: Introduce a "xics" property under the POWER8 chip, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/12/19
- [PATCH 05/10] spapr/xive: Use device_class_set_parent_realize(), Cédric Le Goater, 2019/12/19
- [PATCH 06/10] pnv/xive: Use device_class_set_parent_realize(), Cédric Le Goater, 2019/12/19
- [PATCH 07/10] spapr, pnv, xive: Add a "xive-fabric" link to the XIVE router, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/12/19
- [PATCH 08/10] xive: Use the XIVE fabric link under the XIVE router, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/12/19
- [PATCH 09/10] ppc/pnv: Add an "nr-threads" property to the base chip class, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/12/19