Re: [PULL 04/11] target/arm/cpu64: max cpu: Introduce sve<N> properties

[Richard Henderson]

On 11/13/19 10:30 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Coverity may also be looking at the case where
> TARGET_AARCH64 is not defined. The fallback definition
> of arm_cpu_vq_map_next_smaller() for that situation
> always returns 0.

Yeah, that makes more sense.
I think we can make the fallback g_assert_not_reached().

Testing a patch for all this.


r~