[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to Sp
From: |
Cédric Le Goater |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Sep 2019 07:48:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0 |
On 27/09/2019 07:50, David Gibson wrote:
> This method depends only on the active irq controller. Now that we've
> formalized the notion of active controller we can dispatch directly through
> that, rather than dispatching via SpaprIrq with the dual version having
> to do a second conditional dispatch.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/intc/spapr_xive.c | 12 +++++++++++
> hw/intc/xics_spapr.c | 9 +++++++++
> hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c | 41 ++++++++++----------------------------
> include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h | 4 +++-
> 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c
> index ff1a175b44..52d5e71793 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/spapr_xive.c
> @@ -553,6 +553,17 @@ static int
> spapr_xive_cpu_intc_create(SpaprInterruptController *intc,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void spapr_xive_set_irq(SpaprInterruptController *intc, int irq, int
> val)
> +{
> + SpaprXive *xive = SPAPR_XIVE(intc);
> +
> + if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> + kvmppc_xive_source_set_irq(&xive->source, irq, val);
> + } else {
> + xive_source_set_irq(&xive->source, irq, val);
> + }
> +}
> static void spapr_xive_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> {
> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> @@ -574,6 +585,7 @@ static void spapr_xive_class_init(ObjectClass *klass,
> void *data)
> sicc->cpu_intc_create = spapr_xive_cpu_intc_create;
> sicc->claim_irq = spapr_xive_claim_irq;
> sicc->free_irq = spapr_xive_free_irq;
> + sicc->set_irq = spapr_xive_set_irq;
> }
>
> static const TypeInfo spapr_xive_info = {
> diff --git a/hw/intc/xics_spapr.c b/hw/intc/xics_spapr.c
> index 224fe1efcd..02372697f6 100644
> --- a/hw/intc/xics_spapr.c
> +++ b/hw/intc/xics_spapr.c
> @@ -373,6 +373,14 @@ static void xics_spapr_free_irq(SpaprInterruptController
> *intc, int irq)
> memset(&ics->irqs[srcno], 0, sizeof(ICSIRQState));
> }
>
> +static void xics_spapr_set_irq(SpaprInterruptController *intc, int irq, int
> val)
> +{
> + ICSState *ics = ICS_SPAPR(intc);
> + uint32_t srcno = irq - ics->offset;
> +
> + ics_set_irq(ics, srcno, val);
> +}
> +
> static void ics_spapr_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
> {
> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
> @@ -384,6 +392,7 @@ static void ics_spapr_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void
> *data)
> sicc->cpu_intc_create = xics_spapr_cpu_intc_create;
> sicc->claim_irq = xics_spapr_claim_irq;
> sicc->free_irq = xics_spapr_free_irq;
> + sicc->set_irq = xics_spapr_set_irq;
> }
>
> static const TypeInfo ics_spapr_info = {
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> index dfa875b7cd..4922062908 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.c
> @@ -123,14 +123,6 @@ static int spapr_irq_post_load_xics(SpaprMachineState
> *spapr, int version_id)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void spapr_irq_set_irq_xics(void *opaque, int irq, int val)
> -{
> - SpaprMachineState *spapr = opaque;
> - uint32_t srcno = irq - spapr->ics->offset;
> -
> - ics_set_irq(spapr->ics, srcno, val);
> -}
> -
> static void spapr_irq_reset_xics(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
> {
> Error *local_err = NULL;
> @@ -159,7 +151,6 @@ SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xics = {
> .dt_populate = spapr_dt_xics,
> .post_load = spapr_irq_post_load_xics,
> .reset = spapr_irq_reset_xics,
> - .set_irq = spapr_irq_set_irq_xics,
> .init_kvm = spapr_irq_init_kvm_xics,
> };
>
> @@ -208,17 +199,6 @@ static void spapr_irq_reset_xive(SpaprMachineState
> *spapr, Error **errp)
> spapr_xive_mmio_set_enabled(spapr->xive, true);
> }
>
> -static void spapr_irq_set_irq_xive(void *opaque, int irq, int val)
> -{
> - SpaprMachineState *spapr = opaque;
> -
> - if (kvm_irqchip_in_kernel()) {
> - kvmppc_xive_source_set_irq(&spapr->xive->source, irq, val);
> - } else {
> - xive_source_set_irq(&spapr->xive->source, irq, val);
> - }
> -}
> -
> static void spapr_irq_init_kvm_xive(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
> {
> if (kvm_enabled()) {
> @@ -236,7 +216,6 @@ SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xive = {
> .dt_populate = spapr_dt_xive,
> .post_load = spapr_irq_post_load_xive,
> .reset = spapr_irq_reset_xive,
> - .set_irq = spapr_irq_set_irq_xive,
> .init_kvm = spapr_irq_init_kvm_xive,
> };
>
> @@ -316,13 +295,6 @@ static void spapr_irq_reset_dual(SpaprMachineState
> *spapr, Error **errp)
> spapr_irq_current(spapr)->reset(spapr, errp);
> }
>
> -static void spapr_irq_set_irq_dual(void *opaque, int irq, int val)
> -{
> - SpaprMachineState *spapr = opaque;
> -
> - spapr_irq_current(spapr)->set_irq(spapr, irq, val);
> -}
> -
> /*
> * Define values in sync with the XIVE and XICS backend
> */
> @@ -336,7 +308,6 @@ SpaprIrq spapr_irq_dual = {
> .dt_populate = spapr_irq_dt_populate_dual,
> .post_load = spapr_irq_post_load_dual,
> .reset = spapr_irq_reset_dual,
> - .set_irq = spapr_irq_set_irq_dual,
> .init_kvm = NULL, /* should not be used */
> };
Above changes are all fine. I am still dubious for the 'active_intc'.
C.
> @@ -422,6 +393,15 @@ int spapr_irq_cpu_intc_create(SpaprMachineState *spapr,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void spapr_set_irq(void *opaque, int irq, int level)
> +{
> + SpaprMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(opaque);
> + SpaprInterruptControllerClass *sicc
> + = SPAPR_INTC_GET_CLASS(spapr->active_intc);
> +
> + sicc->set_irq(spapr->active_intc, irq, level);
> +}
> +
> void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp)
> {
> MachineState *machine = MACHINE(spapr);
> @@ -510,7 +490,7 @@ void spapr_irq_init(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error
> **errp)
> spapr_xive_hcall_init(spapr);
> }
>
> - spapr->qirqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(spapr->irq->set_irq, spapr,
> + spapr->qirqs = qemu_allocate_irqs(spapr_set_irq, spapr,
> spapr->irq->nr_xirqs +
> SPAPR_XIRQ_BASE);
>
> out:
> @@ -744,7 +724,6 @@ SpaprIrq spapr_irq_xics_legacy = {
> .dt_populate = spapr_dt_xics,
> .post_load = spapr_irq_post_load_xics,
> .reset = spapr_irq_reset_xics,
> - .set_irq = spapr_irq_set_irq_xics,
> .init_kvm = spapr_irq_init_kvm_xics,
> };
>
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> index 3102d152b2..8286a9aa63 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_irq.h
> @@ -56,6 +56,9 @@ typedef struct SpaprInterruptControllerClass {
> int (*claim_irq)(SpaprInterruptController *intc, int irq, bool lsi,
> Error **errp);
> void (*free_irq)(SpaprInterruptController *intc, int irq);
> +
> + /* These methods should only be called on the active intc */
> + void (*set_irq)(SpaprInterruptController *intc, int irq, int val);
> } SpaprInterruptControllerClass;
>
> void spapr_irq_update_active_intc(SpaprMachineState *spapr);
> @@ -83,7 +86,6 @@ typedef struct SpaprIrq {
> void *fdt, uint32_t phandle);
> int (*post_load)(SpaprMachineState *spapr, int version_id);
> void (*reset)(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp);
> - void (*set_irq)(void *opaque, int srcno, int val);
> void (*init_kvm)(SpaprMachineState *spapr, Error **errp);
> } SpaprIrq;
>
>
- Re: [PATCH v2 21/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move cpu_intc_create from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH v2 21/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move cpu_intc_create from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/09/30
- Re: [PATCH v2 21/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move cpu_intc_create from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, David Gibson, 2019/09/30
- Re: [PATCH v2 21/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move cpu_intc_create from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, David Gibson, 2019/09/30
- Re: [PATCH v2 21/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move cpu_intc_create from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, Cédric Le Goater, 2019/09/30
- [PATCH v2 19/33] spapr: Eliminate SpaprIrq::init hook, David Gibson, 2019/09/27
- [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, David Gibson, 2019/09/27
- Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, Greg Kurz, 2019/09/27
- Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, David Gibson, 2019/09/30
- Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, Greg Kurz, 2019/09/30
- Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, David Gibson, 2019/09/30
- Re: [PATCH v2 24/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move set_irq from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController,
Cédric Le Goater <=
- [PATCH v2 25/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move print_info from SpaprIrq to SpaprInterruptController, David Gibson, 2019/09/27
- [PATCH v2 27/33] spapr, xics, xive: Match signatures for XICS and XIVE KVM connect routines, David Gibson, 2019/09/27
- [PATCH v2 28/33] spapr: Remove SpaprIrq::init_kvm hook, David Gibson, 2019/09/27
- [PATCH v2 29/33] spapr, xics, xive: Move SpaprIrq::reset hook logic into activate/deactivate, David Gibson, 2019/09/27