Re: [PATCH 0/2] enhance iotest 223 coverage

[Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy]

24.09.2019 17:35, Eric Blake wrote:
> Commit 506902c6 dropped non-iothread coverage in order to test iothread,
> better is to run things twice.  In doing this, I found it easier to
> edit the test when the log shows what commands were triggering various
> responses.

Did you consider adding -iothread to tests/qemu-iotests/check instead, to be
able to run any (or some) tests with or without iothread?

> 
> Eric Blake (2):
>    tests: Make iotest 223 easier to edit
>    tests: More iotest 223 improvements
> 
>   tests/qemu-iotests/223     | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>   tests/qemu-iotests/223.out | 138 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 231 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir