qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] iotests: Add test for failing mirror comple


From: John Snow
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] iotests: Add test for failing mirror complete
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 14:46:28 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.1.0



On 9/12/19 9:56 AM, Max Reitz wrote:
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>
---
  tests/qemu-iotests/041     | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  tests/qemu-iotests/041.out |  4 ++--
  2 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/041 b/tests/qemu-iotests/041
index 8568426311..84bc6d6581 100755
--- a/tests/qemu-iotests/041
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/041
@@ -1121,6 +1121,50 @@ class TestOrphanedSource(iotests.QMPTestCase):
                               target='dest-ro')
          self.assert_qmp(result, 'error/class', 'GenericError')
+ def test_failing_permission_in_complete(self):
+        self.assert_no_active_block_jobs()
+
+        # Unshare consistent-read on the target
+        # (The mirror job does not care)
+        result = self.vm.qmp('blockdev-add',
+                             driver='blkdebug',
+                             node_name='dest-perm',
+                             image='dest',
+                             unshare_child_perms=['consistent-read'])
+        self.assert_qmp(result, 'return', {})
+
+        result = self.vm.qmp('blockdev-mirror', job_id='job', device='src',
+                             sync='full', target='dest',
+                             filter_node_name='mirror-filter')
+        self.assert_qmp(result, 'return', {})
+
+        # Require consistent-read on the source
+        # (We can only add this node once the job has started, or it
+        # will complain that it does not want to run on non-root nodes)
+        result = self.vm.qmp('blockdev-add',
+                             driver='blkdebug',
+                             node_name='src-perm',
+                             image='src',
+                             take_child_perms=['consistent-read'])
+        self.assert_qmp(result, 'return', {})
+
+        # While completing, mirror will attempt to replace src by
+        # dest, which must fail because src-perm requires
+        # consistent-read but dest-perm does not share it; thus
+        # aborting the job when it is supposed to complete
+        self.complete_and_wait('job',
+                               completion_error='Operation not permitted')
+
+        # Assert that all of our nodes are still there (except for the
+        # mirror filter, which should be gone despite the failure)
+        nodes = self.vm.qmp('query-named-block-nodes')['return']
+        nodes = list(map(lambda image: image['node-name'], nodes))

Sadly, the list comprehension is a good suggestion. Squash it in if you'd like.

+
+        for expect in ['src', 'src-perm', 'dest', 'dest-perm']:
+            self.assertTrue(expect in nodes, '%s disappeared' % expect)

I could be a real weenie and say "why not use a tuple here?"

but, I'll only pretend I didn't say that instead of couching it in a self-deprecating wrapper to the same end effect.

(I'm a weenie.)

+        self.assertFalse('mirror-filter' in nodes,
+                         'Mirror filter node did not disappear')
+
  if __name__ == '__main__':
      iotests.main(supported_fmts=['qcow2', 'qed'],
                   supported_protocols=['file'])
diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/041.out b/tests/qemu-iotests/041.out
index 2c448b4239..f496be9197 100644
--- a/tests/qemu-iotests/041.out
+++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/041.out
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
-..........................................................................................
+...........................................................................................
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-Ran 90 tests
+Ran 91 tests
OK


Or don't do anything, because I'm just being obnoxious, and I owe you one for giving you bad advice last round.

Reviewed-by: John Snow <address@hidden>



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]