qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 29/29] tests/tcg: target/s390x: Test MVO


From: David Hildenbrand
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 29/29] tests/tcg: target/s390x: Test MVO
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 11:54:28 +0200
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0

On 18.09.19 11:47, Alex Bennée wrote:
> 
> David Hildenbrand <address@hidden> writes:
> 
>> Let's add the simple test based on the example from the PoP.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <address@hidden>
>> ---
>>  tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target |  1 +
>>  tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c           | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c
>>
>> diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target 
>> b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
>> index 151dc075aa..6a3bfa8b29 100644
>> --- a/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
>> +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/Makefile.target
>> @@ -6,3 +6,4 @@ TESTS+=ipm
>>  TESTS+=exrl-trt
>>  TESTS+=exrl-trtr
>>  TESTS+=pack
>> +TESTS+=mvo
>> diff --git a/tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c b/tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000000..5546fe2a97
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/tests/tcg/s390x/mvo.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
>> +#include <stdint.h>
>> +#include <stdio.h>
>> +
>> +int main(void)
>> +{
>> +    uint8_t dest[6] = {0xff, 0x77, 0x88, 0x99, 0x0c, 0xff};
>> +    uint8_t src[5] = {0xee, 0x12, 0x34, 0x56, 0xee};
>> +    uint8_t expected[6] = {0xff, 0x01, 0x23, 0x45, 0x6c, 0xff};
>> +    int i;
>> +
>> +    asm volatile (
>> +        "    mvo 0(4,%[dest]),0(3,%[src])\n"
>> +        :
>> +        : [dest] "d" (dest + 1),
>> +          [src] "d" (src + 1)
>> +        : "memory");
>> +
>> +    for (i = 0; i < sizeof(expected); i++) {
>> +        if (dest[i] != expected[i]) {
>> +            fprintf(stderr, "bad data\n");
>> +            return 1;
>> +        }
>> +    }
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <address@hidden>
> 
> but...
> 
> can this test be expanded to check the page cross cases that caused you
> so much trouble to track down?

I might add a MVC test that tries to reproduce this. But with
speculative page faults and things like that it might not be very easy
to reproduce. However, I can give it a try.

Thanks!

> 
> --
> Alex Bennée
> 


-- 

Thanks,

David / dhildenb



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]