qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] tests/acceptance: Add tests for the PReP


From: Eduardo Habkost
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/6] tests/acceptance: Add tests for the PReP/40p machine
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 13:14:07 -0300

On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 11:28:23AM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> Hi David,
> 
> On 9/16/19 2:42 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 15, 2019 at 11:19:34PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >> Quick tests worth to avoid regressions with the 40p machine.
> >> idea from the "Maintainers, please tell us how to boot your machines"
> >> thread:
> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-03/msg04177.html
> >>
> >> v2: Split Travis job, added Hervé R-b tag
> >> v1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-06/msg05896.html
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >> Phil.
> > 
> > I'm guessing you're expecting these to go in via the testing tree, in
> > which case
> > 
> > Acked-by: David Gibson <address@hidden>
> 
> Thanks, appreciated :)
> 
> > Or do you want me to take them via the ppc tree?
> 
> I think the 'testing tree' should focus on the CI/testing
> infrastructure, while each subsystem maintainers should care about the
> tests covering their subsystem (the testing tree maintainers might not
> have the required knowledge to be sure a test is correctly implemented).
> 
> In this particular case I assume you don't have much knowledge of that
> PPC machine, which is a hobbyist one, but since you are the PPC
> maintainer, I'd rather see this going via your tree :)
> 
> Alex/Cleber/Eduardo, any comment on this position?

This makes sense to me.  We don't need all new tests to go
through the same tree.

-- 
Eduardo



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]