Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/13] qcrypto-luks: refactoring: simplify the math used for keyslot locations

[Maxim Levitsky]

On Thu, 2019-08-22 at 11:47 +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:22:10PM +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <address@hidden>
> > ---
> >  crypto/block-luks.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> >  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/crypto/block-luks.c b/crypto/block-luks.c
> > index 6bb369f3b4..e1a4df94b7 100644
> > --- a/crypto/block-luks.c
> > +++ b/crypto/block-luks.c
> > @@ -417,6 +417,33 @@ static int masterkeylen(QCryptoBlockLUKS *luks)
> >  }
> >  
> >  
> > +/*
> > + * Returns number of sectors needed to store the key material
> > + * given number of anti forensic stripes
> > + */
> > +static int splitkeylen_sectors(QCryptoBlockLUKS *luks, int stripes)
> 
> Needs a qcrypto_block_luks_ prefix on method name.
Done.

> 
> I'd also put 'static int' on a separate line from method name
> to reduce too long lines.
Done.
> 
> > +
> > +{
> > +    /*
> > +     * This calculation doesn't match that shown in the spec,
> > +     * but instead follows the cryptsetup implementation.
> > +     */
> > +
> > +    size_t header_sectors = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> > +                     QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE;
> 
> Following line indent should only be 4 spaces
I didn't knew that. Fixed.
> 
> > +
> > +    size_t splitkeylen = masterkeylen(luks) * stripes;
> > +
> > +    /* First align the key material size to block size*/
> > +    size_t splitkeylen_sectors =
> > +            DIV_ROUND_UP(splitkeylen, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE);
> 
> Again 4 space indent.
> 
> > +
> > +    /* Then also align the key material size to the size of the header */
> > +    return ROUND_UP(splitkeylen_sectors, header_sectors);
> > +}
> > +
> > +
> > +
> >  /*
> >   * Stores the main LUKS header, taking care of endianess
> >   */
> > @@ -1169,7 +1196,7 @@ qcrypto_block_luks_create(QCryptoBlock *block,
> >      QCryptoBlockCreateOptionsLUKS luks_opts;
> >      Error *local_err = NULL;
> >      uint8_t *masterkey = NULL;
> > -    size_t splitkeylen = 0;
> > +    size_t next_sector;
> >      size_t i;
> >      char *password;
> >      const char *cipher_alg;
> > @@ -1388,23 +1415,16 @@ qcrypto_block_luks_create(QCryptoBlock *block,
> >          goto error;
> >      }
> >  
> > +    /* start with the sector that follows the header*/
> > +    next_sector = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> > +                  QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE;
> 
> I'd suggest 'post_header_sector'
I called it now header_sectors, and each split key, split_key_sectors.
I hope that this is good enough.
> 
> >  
> > -    /* Although LUKS has multiple key slots, we're just going
> > -     * to use the first key slot */
> > -    splitkeylen = luks->header.key_bytes * QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES;
> >      for (i = 0; i < QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_NUM_KEY_SLOTS; i++) {
> > -        luks->header.key_slots[i].active = 
> > QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_DISABLED;
> > -        luks->header.key_slots[i].stripes = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES;
> > -
> > -        /* This calculation doesn't match that shown in the spec,
> > -         * but instead follows the cryptsetup implementation.
> > -         */
> > -        luks->header.key_slots[i].key_offset =
> > -            (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> > -             QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE) +
> > -            (ROUND_UP(DIV_ROUND_UP(splitkeylen, 
> > QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE),
> > -                      (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> > -                       QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE)) * i);
> > +        QCryptoBlockLUKSKeySlot *slot = &luks->header.key_slots[i];
> > +        slot->active = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_DISABLED;
> > +        slot->key_offset = next_sector;
> > +        slot->stripes = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES;
> > +        next_sector += splitkeylen_sectors(luks, 
> > QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES);
> 
> I'm not a fan of the next_sector accumulator .
I actually think that accumulator is cleaner here,
but I won't argue about this. Fixed.


> 
> I'd prefer to see the '* i' part done in splitkeylen_sectors, so that
> we have
> 
>   slot->key_offset = post_header_sector +
>         splitkeylen_sectors(luks, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES, i);
> 
> > @@ -1412,17 +1432,9 @@ qcrypto_block_luks_create(QCryptoBlock *block,
> >       * slot headers, rounded up to the nearest sector, combined with
> >       * the size of each master key material region, also rounded up
> >       * to the nearest sector */
> > -    luks->header.payload_offset =
> > -        (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> > -         QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE) +
> > -        (ROUND_UP(DIV_ROUND_UP(splitkeylen, 
> > QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE),
> > -                  (QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_KEY_SLOT_OFFSET /
> > -                   QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE)) *
> > -         QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_NUM_KEY_SLOTS);
> > -
> > +    luks->header.payload_offset = next_sector;
> 
>   luks->header.payload_offset = post_header_sector +
>         splitkeylen_sectors(luks, QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_STRIPES,
>                           QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_NUM_KEY_SLOTS);
> 
> 
> >      block->sector_size = QCRYPTO_BLOCK_LUKS_SECTOR_SIZE;
> > -    block->payload_offset = luks->header.payload_offset *
> > -        block->sector_size;
> > +    block->payload_offset = luks->header.payload_offset * 
> > block->sector_size;
> 
> 
> This is reverting a whitspace change done in previous method
True. Fixed.

> 
> Regards,
> Daniel


Best regards,
        Maxim Levitsky