[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression with floppy drive controller
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression with floppy drive controller |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Aug 2019 16:00:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 |
On 8/20/19 3:38 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 8/20/19 3:12 PM, John Snow wrote:
>> On 8/20/19 6:25 AM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>> [cross posting QEMU & SeaBIOS]
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'v been looking at a QEMU bug report [1] which bisection resulted in a
>>> SeaBIOS commit:
>>>
>>> 4a6dbcea3e412fe12effa2f812f50dd7eae90955 is the first bad commit
>>> commit 4a6dbcea3e412fe12effa2f812f50dd7eae90955
>>> Author: Nikolay Nikolov <address@hidden>
>>> Date: Sun Feb 4 17:27:01 2018 +0200
>>>
>>> floppy: Use timer_check() in floppy_wait_irq()
>>>
>>> Use timer_check() instead of using floppy_motor_counter in BDA for the
>>> timeout check in floppy_wait_irq().
>>>
>>> The problem with using floppy_motor_counter was that, after it reaches
>>> 0, it immediately stops the floppy motors, which is not what is
>>> supposed to happen on real hardware. Instead, after a timeout (like in
>>> the end of every floppy operation, regardless of the result - success,
>>> timeout or error), the floppy motors must be kept spinning for
>>> additional 2 seconds (the FLOPPY_MOTOR_TICKS). So, now the
>>> floppy_motor_counter is initialized to 255 (the max value) in the
>>> beginning of the floppy operation. For IRQ timeouts, a different
>>> timeout is used, specified by the new FLOPPY_IRQ_TIMEOUT constant
>>> (currently set to 5 seconds - a fairly conservative value, but should
>>> work reliably on most floppies).
>>>
>>> After the floppy operation, floppy_drive_pio() resets the
>>> floppy_motor_counter to 2 seconds (FLOPPY_MOTOR_TICKS).
>>>
>>> This is also consistent with what other PC BIOSes do.
>>>
>>>
>>> This commit improve behavior with real hardware, so maybe QEMU is not
>>> modelling something or modelling it incorrectly?
> [...]
>>
>> Well, that's unfortunate.
>>
>> What version of QEMU shipped the SeaBIOS that caused the regression?
>
> See https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1840719/comments/3
>
> QEMU commit 0b8f74488e, slighly before QEMU v3.1.0
> (previous tag is v3.0.0).
>
> But you can use v4.1.0 too, simply change the SeaBIOS bios.bin, i.e.:
>
> qemu$ git checkout v4.1.0
>
> qemu$ (cd roms/seabios && git checkout 4a6dbcea3e4~) && \
> make -C roms bios
>
> Now pc-bios/bios.bin is built using the last commit working,
>
> qemu$ (cd roms/seabios && git checkout 4a6dbcea3e4) && \
> make -C roms bios
>
> And you can reproduce the error.
Looking at the fdc timer I noticed it use a static '50 ns' magic value.
Increasing this value allows the floppy image to boot again, using this
snippet:
-- >8 --
diff --git a/hw/block/fdc.c b/hw/block/fdc.c
index 9b24cb9b85..5fc54073fd 100644
--- a/hw/block/fdc.c
+++ b/hw/block/fdc.c
@@ -2134,7 +2134,7 @@ static void fdctrl_handle_readid(FDCtrl *fdctrl,
int direction)
cur_drv->head = (fdctrl->fifo[1] >> 2) & 1;
timer_mod(fdctrl->result_timer, qemu_clock_get_ns(QEMU_CLOCK_VIRTUAL) +
- (NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND / 50));
+ (NANOSECONDS_PER_SECOND / 5000));
}
static void fdctrl_handle_format_track(FDCtrl *fdctrl, int direction)
---
Any idea what is the correct value to use here?
Regards,
Phil.
- [Qemu-devel] Regression with floppy drive controller, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/08/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression with floppy drive controller, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé, 2019/08/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression with floppy drive controller, Eduardo Habkost, 2019/08/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression with floppy drive controller, Gerd Hoffmann, 2019/08/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Regression with floppy drive controller, Paolo Bonzini, 2019/08/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] Re: Regression with floppy drive controller, Kevin O'Connor, 2019/08/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] Re: Regression with floppy drive controller, Gerd Hoffmann, 2019/08/22