Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] RFH: We lost "connect" events

[Peter Maydell]

On Mon, 19 Aug 2019 at 11:50, Daniel P. Berrangé <address@hidden> wrote:
> I don't think we want to expose this in the QAPI schema for the socket
> address, since the correct value is really something that QEMU should
> figure out based on usage context.
>
> Thus, I think we'll have to make it an explicit parameter to the
> qio_channel_socket_listen_{sync,async} APIs, and socket_listen()
> and inet_listen_saddr(), etc. Then the migration code can pass in
> a sensible value based on multifd usage.

How bad would it be if we just passed SOMAXCONN for the backlog
value always?

thanks
-- PMM