Hi Alexey,
On 8/12/19 7:42 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
Currently we basically print IO address twice, fix this.
Fixes: 7e472264e9e2 ("PPC: spapr: iommu: rework traces")
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <address@hidden>
---
hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c
index bd3d0256a65d..6fe57d799a10 100644
--- a/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c
+++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_iommu.c
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static IOMMUTLBEntry
spapr_tce_translate_iommu(IOMMUMemoryRegion *iommu,
ret.addr_mask = ~page_mask;
ret.perm = spapr_tce_iommu_access_flags(tce);
}
- trace_spapr_iommu_xlate(tcet->liobn, addr, ret.iova, ret.perm,
+ trace_spapr_iommu_xlate(tcet->liobn, addr, ret.translated_addr, ret.perm,
ret.addr_mask);
But the trace format is:
spapr_iommu_xlate(uint64_t liobn, uint64_t ioba, uint64_t tce, unsigned
perm, unsigned pgsize) "liobn=%"PRIx64" 0x%"PRIx64" -> 0x%"PRIx64"
perm=%u mask=%x"
So this could be more appropriate:
trace_spapr_iommu_xlate(tcet->liobn, ret.iova, ret.translated_addr,
ret.perm, ret.addr_mask);
Anyhow your patch is an improvment, so regardless addr/ret.iova: