[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 09/22] target/arm: Implement ARMv8.5-CondM
From: |
Alex Bennée |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 09/22] target/arm: Implement ARMv8.5-CondM |
Date: |
Fri, 09 Aug 2019 17:02:17 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.3.4; emacs 27.0.50 |
Richard Henderson <address@hidden> writes:
> On 8/9/19 2:53 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Hi -- it's just been pointed out to me that if our 'max' CPU
>> supports v8.5-CondM then we ought to be setting the HWCAP2_FLAGM2
>> bit in the hwcaps for linux-user mode. (Maybe we implemented this
>> before the kernel defined the hwcap bit?)
>
> Yep. We added CondM in March and this hwcap bit was added in June.
>
> I keep thinking that they'll stop adding hwcap bits that can now just as
> easily
> be "read" (trap and emulated) from id registers. They've filled up HWCAP, and
> only have 23 left in HWCAP2.
It's impressive on our modern hardware that bits are getting so scarce
;-)
We haven't yet started on filling up cs_base for our own flags but where
does it all end?
--
Alex Bennée