[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 16/29] Include exec/memory.h slightly less
From: |
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 16/29] Include exec/memory.h slightly less |
Date: |
Thu, 8 Aug 2019 14:36:21 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 |
On 8/8/19 2:16 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> On 8/6/19 5:14 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Drop unnecessary inclusions from headers. Downgrade a few more to
>>> exec/hwaddr.h.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Markus Armbruster <address@hidden>
>>> ---
>>> hw/audio/lm4549.h | 1 +
>>> hw/display/edid-region.c | 1 +
>>> hw/display/tc6393xb.c | 1 +
>>> hw/net/can/can_sja1000.h | 1 +
>>> hw/net/ne2000.c | 1 +
>>> hw/xtensa/xtensa_memory.h | 1 -
>>> include/hw/arm/boot.h | 1 -
>>> include/hw/arm/fsl-imx7.h | 1 -
>>> include/hw/arm/soc_dma.h | 2 +-
>>> include/hw/block/flash.h | 2 +-
>>> include/hw/boards.h | 1 +
>>> include/hw/char/parallel.h | 1 -
>>> include/hw/display/milkymist_tmu2.h | 1 +
>>> include/hw/display/tc6393xb.h | 2 --
>>> include/hw/display/vga.h | 2 +-
>>> include/hw/hw.h | 1 -
>>> include/hw/i2c/pm_smbus.h | 1 +
>>> include/hw/i2c/smbus_eeprom.h | 1 +
>>> include/hw/misc/auxbus.h | 1 +
>>> include/hw/ppc/xics.h | 1 +
>>> include/hw/usb.h | 1 +
>>> include/hw/virtio/virtio.h | 1 +
>>> migration/colo.c | 1 +
>>> migration/migration.h | 1 +
>>> migration/postcopy-ram.c | 1 +
>>> migration/rdma.c | 1 +
>>> 26 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>>
>> [...]> diff --git a/migration/colo.c b/migration/colo.c
>>> index 9f84b1fa3c..0b5b620391 100644
>>> --- a/migration/colo.c
>>> +++ b/migration/colo.c
>>> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>>> #include "io/channel-buffer.h"
>>> #include "trace.h"
>>> #include "qemu/error-report.h"
>>> +#include "qemu/rcu.h"
>>> #include "migration/failover.h"
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_REPLICATION
>>> #include "replication.h"
>>> diff --git a/migration/migration.h b/migration/migration.h
>>> index 26f01d00f6..a7882af67a 100644
>>> --- a/migration/migration.h
>>> +++ b/migration/migration.h
>>> @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
>>> #ifndef QEMU_MIGRATION_H
>>> #define QEMU_MIGRATION_H
>>>
>>> +#include "exec/cpu-common.h"
>>> #include "qapi/qapi-types-migration.h"
>>> #include "qemu/thread.h"
>>> #include "qemu/coroutine_int.h"
>>> diff --git a/migration/postcopy-ram.c b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
>>> index 9faacacc9e..56054d0a73 100644
>>> --- a/migration/postcopy-ram.c
>>> +++ b/migration/postcopy-ram.c
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>>> #include "ram.h"
>>> #include "qapi/error.h"
>>> #include "qemu/notify.h"
>>> +#include "qemu/rcu.h"
>>> #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
>>> #include "sysemu/balloon.h"
>>> #include "qemu/error-report.h"
>>> diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c
>>> index 3036221ee8..b0e27b6174 100644
>>> --- a/migration/rdma.c
>>> +++ b/migration/rdma.c
>>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>>> #include "qemu/error-report.h"
>>> #include "qemu/main-loop.h"
>>> #include "qemu/module.h"
>>> +#include "qemu/rcu.h"
>>> #include "qemu/sockets.h"
>>> #include "qemu/bitmap.h"
>>> #include "qemu/coroutine.h"
>>>
>>
>> To keep this patch cleaner, can you use a preparatory patch adding the
>> various "qemu/rcu.h"?
>
> How would I explain that new patch?
>
> Other patches that drop includes from headers also fix up their users by
> adding the includes that are actually needed there, e.g.:
>
> * PATCH 03: hw/qdev-core.h dropped, fixups add only qemu/bitops.h or
> hw/irq.h.
>
> * PATCH 10: hw/ide/internal.h dropped, some fixups add only
> exec/address-spaces.h or sysemu/sysemu.h.
>
> * PATCH 17: qom/object.h dropped, fixup adds only hw/hw.h.
>
> * PATCH 20: qemu/main-loop.h dropped, some fixups add only block/aio.h
> or qemu/thread.h. Touches five times as many files as this one...
>
> * More.
I See.
> Does each of them need preparatory patches?
If those are only 4, why not... However this series is already big
enough, and what matters more: bisectable. Preparatory 3-lines patch
makes no difference, I was just aiming at perfection ;)
I am happy with the current organization.
> Would it help if their commit messages explained the fixups more
> clearly?
No, not that much, each commit is already well explained.
Sorry for the noise!
Phil,