[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.2 v3 0/2] s390: stop abusing memory_region
From: |
Christian Borntraeger |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.2 v3 0/2] s390: stop abusing memory_region_allocate_system_memory() |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Aug 2019 16:59:56 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
On 02.08.19 16:42, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> On 02.08.19 15:32, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>> Changelog:
>> since v2:
>> - break migration from old QEMU (since 2.12-4.1) for guest with >8TB RAM
>> and drop migratable aliases patch as was agreed during v2 review
>> - drop 4.2 machines patch as it's not prerequisite anymore
>> since v1:
>> - include 4.2 machines patch for adding compat RAM layout on top
>> - 2/4 add missing in v1 patch for splitting too big MemorySection on
>> several memslots
>> - 3/4 amend code path on alias destruction to ensure that RAMBlock is
>> cleaned properly
>> - 4/4 add compat machine code to keep old layout (migration-wise) for
>> 4.1 and older machines
>>
>>
>> While looking into unifying guest RAM allocation to use hostmem backends
>> for initial RAM (especially when -mempath is used) and retiring
>> memory_region_allocate_system_memory() API, leaving only single hostmem
>> backend,
>> I was inspecting how currently it is used by boards and it turns out several
>> boards abuse it by calling the function several times (despite documented
>> contract
>> forbiding it).
>>
>> s390 is one of such boards where KVM limitation on memslot size got
>> propagated
>> to board design and memory_region_allocate_system_memory() was abused to
>> satisfy
>> KVM requirement for max RAM chunk where memory region alias would suffice.
>>
>> Unfortunately, memory_region_allocate_system_memory() usage created migration
>> dependency where guest RAM is transferred in migration stream as several
>> RAMBlocks
>> if it's more than KVM_SLOT_MAX_BYTES. During v2 review it was agreed to
>> ignore
>> migration breakage (documenting it in release notes) and leaving only KVM
>> fix.
>>
>> In order to replace these several RAM chunks with a single memdev and keep it
>> working with KVM memslot size limit, following was done:
>> * [1/2] split too big RAM chunk inside of KVM code on several memory slots
>> if necessary
>> * [2/2] drop manual ram splitting in s390 code
>>
>>
>> CC: address@hidden
>> CC: address@hidden
>> CC: address@hidden
>> CC: address@hidden
>> CC: address@hidden
>> CC: address@hidden
>
> With the fixup this patch set seems to work on s390. I can start 9TB guests
> and
> I can migrate smaller guests between 4.1+patch and 4.0 and 3.1. I currently
> can
> not test migration for the 9TB guest due to lack of a 2nd system.
I have to correct myself. The 9TB guest started up but it does not seem to do
anything useful (it hangs).
I will try to investigate.
>>
>> Igor Mammedov (2):
>> kvm: s390: split too big memory section on several memslots
>> s390: do not call memory_region_allocate_system_memory() multiple
>> times
>>
>> include/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h | 10 ++++
>> include/sysemu/kvm_int.h | 1 +
>> accel/kvm/kvm-all.c | 79 ++++++++++++++++++------------
>> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 30 ++----------
>> target/s390x/kvm.c | 1 +
>> 5 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
>>