qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] virtiofsd: prevent FUSE_INIT/FUSE_DESTROY races


From: Stefan Hajnoczi
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] virtiofsd: prevent FUSE_INIT/FUSE_DESTROY races
Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2019 17:54:07 +0100

When running with multiple threads it can be tricky to handle
FUSE_INIT/FUSE_DESTROY in parallel with other request types or in
parallel with themselves.  Serialize FUSE_INIT and FUSE_DESTROY so that
malicious clients cannot trigger race conditions.

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden>
---
 contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_i.h        |  1 +
 contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+)

diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_i.h b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_i.h
index ff6e1b75ba..dcde9feb97 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_i.h
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_i.h
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct fuse_session {
        struct fuse_req list;
        struct fuse_req interrupts;
        pthread_mutex_t lock;
+       pthread_rwlock_t init_rwlock;
        int got_destroy;
        int broken_splice_nonblock;
        uint64_t notify_ctr;
diff --git a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c 
b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
index 6ebf237baa..483a1bc9be 100644
--- a/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
+++ b/contrib/virtiofsd/fuse_lowlevel.c
@@ -2473,6 +2473,18 @@ void fuse_session_process_buf_int(struct fuse_session 
*se,
        req->ctx.pid = in->pid;
        req->ch = ch ? fuse_chan_get(ch) : NULL;
 
+       /* INIT and DESTROY requests are serialized, all other request types
+        * run in parallel.  This prevents races between FUSE_INIT and ordinary
+        * requests, FUSE_INIT and FUSE_INIT, FUSE_INIT and FUSE_DESTROY, and
+        * FUSE_DESTROY and FUSE_DESTROY.
+        */
+       if (in->opcode == FUSE_INIT || in->opcode == CUSE_INIT ||
+           in->opcode == FUSE_DESTROY) {
+               pthread_rwlock_wrlock(&se->init_rwlock);
+       } else {
+               pthread_rwlock_rdlock(&se->init_rwlock);
+       }
+
        err = EIO;
        if (!se->got_init) {
                enum fuse_opcode expected;
@@ -2524,10 +2536,13 @@ void fuse_session_process_buf_int(struct fuse_session 
*se,
                do_write_buf(req, in->nodeid, &iter, bufv);
        else
                fuse_ll_ops[in->opcode].func(req, in->nodeid, &iter);
+
+       pthread_rwlock_unlock(&se->init_rwlock);
        return;
 
 reply_err:
        fuse_reply_err(req, err);
+       pthread_rwlock_unlock(&se->init_rwlock);
 }
 
 #define LL_OPTION(n,o,v) \
@@ -2569,6 +2584,7 @@ void fuse_session_destroy(struct fuse_session *se)
                if (se->op.destroy)
                        se->op.destroy(se->userdata, se);
        }
+       pthread_rwlock_destroy(&se->init_rwlock);
        pthread_mutex_destroy(&se->lock);
        free(se->cuse_data);
        if (se->fd != -1)
@@ -2656,6 +2672,7 @@ struct fuse_session *fuse_session_new(struct fuse_args 
*args,
        list_init_req(&se->list);
        list_init_req(&se->interrupts);
        fuse_mutex_init(&se->lock);
+       pthread_rwlock_init(&se->init_rwlock, NULL);
 
        memcpy(&se->op, op, op_size);
        se->owner = getuid();
-- 
2.21.0




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]