qemu-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] hw/i386: update copyright notice


From: David Kiarie
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] hw/i386: update copyright notice
Date: Mon, 4 Mar 2019 18:39:27 +0300

On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:33 PM David Kiarie <address@hidden> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:32 PM David Kiarie <address@hidden>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:27 PM David Kiarie <address@hidden>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:23 PM Thomas Huth <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04/03/2019 16.13, David Kiarie wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >                             Hi David,
>>>> >
>>>> >                             On 2/23/19 11:54 AM, David Kiarie wrote:
>>>> >                             > Signed-off-by: David Kiarie
>>>> >                             <address@hidden
>>>> >                             <mailto:address@hidden>>
>>>> >                             > ---
>>>> >                             >  hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 2 +-
>>>> >                             >  hw/i386/amd_iommu.h | 2 +-
>>>> >                             >  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
>>>> >                             deletions(-)
>>>> >                             >
>>>> >                             > diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>>>> >                             b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>>>> >                             > index 8ad707a..4f179da 100644
>>>> >                             > --- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>>>> >                             > +++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c
>>>> >                             > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
>>>> >                             >   * QEMU emulation of AMD IOMMU (AMD-Vi)
>>>> >                             >   *
>>>> >                             >   * Copyright (C) 2011 Eduard - Gabriel
>>>> >                             Munteanu
>>>> >                             > - * Copyright (C) 2015 David Kiarie,
>>>> >                             <address@hidden
>>>> >                             <mailto:address@hidden>>
>>>> >                             > + * Copyright (C) 2016 David Kiarie
>>>> Kahurani
>>>> >
>>>> >                             Why do you change the year? Because your
>>>> >                             work was merged in 2016?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >                         no.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >                     though, if you have a legitimate issue with the
>>>> >                     change, you can always air it.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >                 you might think random emails are weird but Paolo, i
>>>> >                 don't expect to see any activity from you, on Qemu
>>>> repo
>>>> >                 before this issue is sorted ;-)
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >             i mostly don't care about this code but i *wrote* it. if i
>>>> >             am not allowed even make such minor(which i not a
>>>> routine),
>>>> >             why shouldn't i ask you to take the files down?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >         or, rather, a small issue turns into a scene about how clean
>>>> >         Qemu is. why not take down all my dirty code?
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >     look i'm resending this patch and next time we're having this
>>>> >     conversation, i'll be defacing qemu.
>>>> >
>>>> > either you have to update my code to what i think it should look like
>>>> or
>>>> > you have to take down - wtf
>>>> >
>>>> > then you try to cook rubbish over it.
>>>>
>>>> Hey, calm down. Paolo said that he'd queue your patch, so it will
>>>> eventually get applied. But that just might take some time, the
>>>> maintainers only send PULL requests for their queued patches after a
>>>> couple of days. So relax, wait some days, and if your patch still did
>>>> not get applied in a week, then you can start complaining again.
>>>>
>>>
>>> i'll not complain again, i'm make a patch to clean my code from your
>>> codebase.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Qemu have never been important to me like it's important to the
>> maintainers.
>>
>>
> i'm sure you can write your own AMD IOMMU.
>

in fact, i'll write the other patch then you can just choose what to merge.

you're not as important as you try to pose.


>
>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Thomas
>>>>
>>>


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]