[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] 3270 improvements
From: |
Halil Pasic |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] 3270 improvements |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Sep 2017 13:00:34 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 |
On 09/21/2017 12:48 PM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Sep 2017 12:22:30 +0200
> Halil Pasic <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> On 09/21/2017 11:24 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> On Wed, 20 Sep 2017 19:23:12 +0200
>>> Halil Pasic <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Jason found some problems with 3270 which he traced down to insufficient
>>>> output buffer size. I've looked into the underlying issue (and the
>>>> relevant code) and I saw strange things. Among others an unreasonable
>>>> assert requiring the payload of a ccw being less than some more or
>>>> less arbitrary limit (dictated by the size of the output buffer).
>>>>
>>>> Because we were already considering converting 3270 to CcwDataStream I've
>>>> decided to try do get rid of this strange limitation on the length of the
>>>> writes too.
>>>>
>>>> This series depends on my IDA work, which can be found here:
>>>> https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-09/msg03434.html.
>>>>
>>>> Halil Pasic (2):
>>>> s390x/3270: IDA support for 3270 via CcwDataStream
>>>> s390x/3270: handle writes of arbitrary length
>>>>
>>>> hw/char/terminal3270.c | 46
>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>>>> hw/s390x/3270-ccw.c | 4 ++--
>>>> include/hw/s390x/3270-ccw.h | 5 ++---
>>>> 3 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> Are you planning to do some further work on 3270, btw?
>>>
>>
>> I did not. I jumped in because of IDA, and because I did
>> not agree with increasing the buffer size to another arbitrary
>> an value (and essentially keep the bug). I hope the original
>> authors will do further polishing.
>
> That was actually a plural 'you' (a pity that English uses the same
> word for both...)
>
OK, I've projected it to myself.
>>
>> I'm just curious, what's behind the question?
>
> Just whether I can expect more 3270 changes in the future :) Things
> like support for multiple devices, whatever. Mostly curiousity.
>
Actually, I wanted to ask the same question from the guy
responsible for the answer. I don't know yet, but I'm sure
now I want to ask (Stefan R.). I will let you know later.
Halil
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] s390x/3270: IDA support for 3270 via CcwDataStream, (continued)