[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Apr 2017 17:09:05 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
On 04/04/2017 16:53, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> The big question is how this fits into release management. We have
>> another important regression from the op blocker work and only a week
>> to go before the last rc. Are we going to delay 2.9 arbitrarily? Are
>> we going to shorten the 2.10 development period correspondingly? (I
>> vote yes and yes, FWIW).
> Which is the other regression?
The assertion failure for snapshot_blkdev with iothreads.
Paolo
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Kevin Wolf, 2017/04/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Max Reitz, 2017/04/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Kevin Wolf, 2017/04/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Peter Krempa, 2017/04/03
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Kevin Wolf, 2017/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Eric Blake, 2017/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Kevin Wolf, 2017/04/04
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Kevin Wolf, 2017/04/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Paolo Bonzini, 2017/04/05
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Kevin Wolf, 2017/04/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Kevin Wolf, 2017/04/06
- Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Eric Blake, 2017/04/03
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Eric Blake, 2017/04/03
Re: [Qemu-devel] nbd: Possible regression in 2.9 RCs, Peter Krempa, 2017/04/03