[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix some typos
From: |
Alex Williamson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] pci: fix some typos |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Nov 2016 18:43:54 -0700 |
On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 09:37:58 +0800
Cao jin <address@hidden> wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Cao jin <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/pci/pcie.c | 2 +-
> hw/vfio/pci.c | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Send separate patches. Thanks,
Alex
>
> diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> index 99cfb45..39b10b8 100644
> --- a/hw/pci/pcie.c
> +++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c
> @@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static void pcie_ext_cap_set_next(PCIDevice *dev,
> uint16_t pos, uint16_t next)
> }
>
> /*
> - * caller must supply valid (offset, size) * such that the range shouldn't
> + * Caller must supply valid (offset, size) such that the range wouldn't
> * overlap with other capability or other registers.
> * This function doesn't check it.
> */
> diff --git a/hw/vfio/pci.c b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> index 31aaecb..c94987c 100644
> --- a/hw/vfio/pci.c
> +++ b/hw/vfio/pci.c
> @@ -1881,8 +1881,8 @@ static void vfio_add_ext_cap(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev)
> * 0 is reserved for this since absence of capabilities is indicated by
> * 0 for the ID, version, AND next pointer. However,
> pcie_add_capability()
> * uses ID 0 as reserved for list management and will incorrectly match
> and
> - * assert if we attempt to pre-load the head of the chain with with this
> - * ID. Use ID 0xFFFF temporarily since it is also seems to be reserved
> in
> + * assert if we attempt to pre-load the head of the chain with this ID.
> + * Use ID 0xFFFF temporarily since it is also seems to be reserved in
> * part for identifying absence of capabilities in a root complex
> register
> * block. If the ID still exists after adding capabilities, switch back
> to
> * zero. We'll mark this entire first dword as emulated for this
> purpose.