[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] spapr: Handle "ibm, nmi-register" and "i
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] spapr: Handle "ibm, nmi-register" and "ibm, nmi-interlock" RTAS calls |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Dec 2015 14:51:09 +1100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 11:38:22AM +0530, Aravinda Prasad wrote:
> This patch adds support in QEMU to handle "ibm,nmi-register"
> and "ibm,nmi-interlock" RTAS calls.
>
> The machine check notification address is saved when the
> OS issues "ibm,nmi-register" RTAS call.
>
> This patch also handles the case when multiple processors
> experience machine check at or about the same time by
> handling "ibm,nmi-interlock" call. In such cases, as per
> PAPR, subsequent processors serialize waiting for the first
> processor to issue the "ibm,nmi-interlock" call. The second
> processor waits till the first processor, which also
> received a machine check error, is done reading the error
> log. The first processor issues "ibm,nmi-interlock" call
> when the error log is consumed. This patch implements the
> releasing part of the error-log while subsequent patch
> (which builds error log) handles the locking part.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aravinda Prasad <address@hidden>
> ---
> hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/hw/ppc/spapr.h | 10 +++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> index 9869bc9..17c4672 100644
> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_rtas.c
> @@ -597,6 +597,38 @@ out:
> rtas_st(rets, 0, rc);
> }
>
> +static void rtas_ibm_nmi_register(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> + sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> + uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
> + target_ulong args,
> + uint32_t nret, target_ulong rets)
> +{
> + spapr->mc_in_progress = false;
> + qemu_cond_init(&spapr->mc_delivery_cond);
I think initializing mc_in_progress and the condition variable should
go in the overall initialization (in fact during system reset) instead
of here. Things using these shouldn't be invoked until after the
nmi_register, but it's safer to have the qemu internal variables
initialized beforehand.
> + spapr->guest_machine_check_addr = rtas_ld(args, 1);
> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
> +}
It also looks like you need to add code to clear
guest_machine_check_addr if the system is reset
> +static void rtas_ibm_nmi_interlock(PowerPCCPU *cpu,
> + sPAPRMachineState *spapr,
> + uint32_t token, uint32_t nargs,
> + target_ulong args,
> + uint32_t nret, target_ulong rets)
> +{
> + if (!spapr->guest_machine_check_addr) {
> + /* NMI register not called */
> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_PARAM_ERROR);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * VCPU issuing "ibm,nmi-interlock" is done with NMI handling,
> + * hence unset mc_in_progress.
> + */
> + spapr->mc_in_progress = false;
> + qemu_cond_signal(&spapr->mc_delivery_cond);
> + rtas_st(rets, 0, RTAS_OUT_SUCCESS);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static struct rtas_call {
> const char *name;
> spapr_rtas_fn fn;
> @@ -747,6 +779,10 @@ static void core_rtas_register_types(void)
> rtas_get_sensor_state);
> spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_IBM_CONFIGURE_CONNECTOR,
> "ibm,configure-connector",
> rtas_ibm_configure_connector);
> + spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_IBM_NMI_REGISTER, "ibm,nmi-register",
> + rtas_ibm_nmi_register);
> + spapr_rtas_register(RTAS_IBM_NMI_INTERLOCK, "ibm,nmi-interlock",
> + rtas_ibm_nmi_interlock);
> }
>
> type_init(core_rtas_register_types)
> diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> index b5cadd7..de84a4e 100644
> --- a/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,12 @@ struct sPAPRMachineState {
> /* RTAS state */
> QTAILQ_HEAD(, sPAPRConfigureConnectorState) ccs_list;
>
> + /* State related to "ibm,nmi-register" and "ibm,nmi-interlock" calls */
> + target_ulong guest_machine_check_addr;
> + bool mc_in_progress;
> + int mc_cpu;
mc_cpu doesn't appear to be used.
I think guest_machine_check_addr and mc_in_progress will also need to
be added to migration state.
> + QemuCond mc_delivery_cond;
> +
> /*< public >*/
> char *kvm_type;
> };
> @@ -458,8 +464,10 @@ int spapr_allocate_irq_block(int num, bool lsi, bool
> msi);
> #define RTAS_IBM_SET_SLOT_RESET (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x23)
> #define RTAS_IBM_CONFIGURE_PE (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x24)
> #define RTAS_IBM_SLOT_ERROR_DETAIL (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x25)
> +#define RTAS_IBM_NMI_REGISTER (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x26)
> +#define RTAS_IBM_NMI_INTERLOCK (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x27)
>
> -#define RTAS_TOKEN_MAX (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x26)
> +#define RTAS_TOKEN_MAX (RTAS_TOKEN_BASE + 0x28)
>
> /* RTAS ibm,get-system-parameter token values */
> #define RTAS_SYSPARM_SPLPAR_CHARACTERISTICS 20
>
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/4] target-ppc/spapr: Add FWNMI support in QEMU for PowerKVM guests, Aravinda Prasad, 2015/12/16
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] spapr: Register and handle HCALL to receive updated RTAS region, Aravinda Prasad, 2015/12/16
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] spapr: Handle "ibm, nmi-register" and "ibm, nmi-interlock" RTAS calls, Aravinda Prasad, 2015/12/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] spapr: Handle "ibm, nmi-register" and "ibm, nmi-interlock" RTAS calls,
David Gibson <=
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] target-ppc: Handle NMI guest exit, Aravinda Prasad, 2015/12/16
- [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] spapr: Introduce FWNMI KVM capability, Aravinda Prasad, 2015/12/16