[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage
From: |
Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Jan 2015 08:34:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 |
On 14/01/2015 03:41, Zhang Haoyu wrote:
> Hi, Paolo,
> what's advantages of drive_mirror over traditional mechanism implemented in
> block-migration.c ?
> Why libvirt use drive_mirror instead of traditional iterative mechanism as
> the default way
> of live migration with non-shared storage?
1) Being able to choose which block devices are migrated, and whether
they are migrated incrementally or not.
2) Finer-grain control the parameters of block migration (dirty bitmap
granularity).
3) Block and RAM migration do not share the same socket and thus can
more easily be parallelized.
Note that 1-2 are not yet supported by libvirt as far as I remember.
Paolo
- [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Zhang Haoyu, 2015/01/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Zhang Haoyu, 2015/01/12
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/01/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Zhang Haoyu, 2015/01/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage,
Paolo Bonzini <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Zhang Haoyu, 2015/01/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/01/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Zhang Haoyu, 2015/01/14
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/01/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Zhang Haoyu, 2015/01/15
- Re: [Qemu-devel] question about live migration with storage, Paolo Bonzini, 2015/01/15