|
From: | Max Reitz |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 3/3] iotests: Add test for map commands |
Date: | Wed, 22 Oct 2014 16:48:51 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 |
On 2014-10-22 at 16:48, Max Reitz wrote:
On 2014-10-22 at 15:54, Max Reitz wrote:On 2014-10-22 at 15:51, Kevin Wolf wrote:Am 22.10.2014 um 15:24 hat Max Reitz geschrieben:Add a test for qemu-img map and qemu-io -c map on truncated files. Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <address@hidden>Reviewed-by: Kevin Wolf <address@hidden> But how about adding a case for patch 2, too? Or is that one mostly theoretical (like the image file being modified in the background) and not reproducible reliably?See the cover letter, I could not find a way to test patch 2 without triggering the changes introduced by patch 1. Yes, modifying the image in the background could be a way to do this. I could try, but I don't know if we really need a test for it.I'll give myself a couple of minutes and if it doesn't work, well, then this test stays the same in v3.And I just realized that my series "raw-posix: Fix raw_co_get_block_status()" contains exactly such a test, which is also the reason why it doesn't work without this series.
And now I realized I hadn't sent out the latest version of that series, which includes this test, yet. Will do.
Max
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |