[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] microblaze: About running upstream main branc
From: |
Chen Gang |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [Consult] microblaze: About running upstream main branch qemu |
Date: |
Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:41:14 +0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.2.0 |
On 10/21/14 12:37, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/20/2014 08:23 AM, Chen Gang wrote:
>> On 10/19/2014 10:58 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>
>>> This doesn't use devicetree, but the configurations are known to be working
>>> with kernel releases all the way back to kernel version 3.10.
>>>
>>
>> Yeah, really it is !
>>
>> After try upstream qemu and upstream kernel, for me, neither them can
>> work well. For xilinx qemu with xilinux kernel, it should be well,
>> although I still met issue below, is what I have done incorrect?
>>
>
> Difficult to say.
>
> I use gcc 4.8.0 from kernel.org and qemu 2.1.2 with its default configuration
> for the microblaze big endian target. No idea if that makes a difference,
> but I would suggest to start with those.
>
> For microblazeel I use gcc 4.9.1 built with buildroot 2014.08 for both
> kernel and initramfs. Initramfs for that target is built from busybox.
>
OK, thank you very much for your information.
But sorry, I have to stop trying, because that is far from upstream qemu
and upstream kernel (at present, I have no enough time resource on it).
My original goal is "use upstream microblaze qemu to test upstream gcc,
binutils and glibc of microblaze". And now I find another ways: "use sim
which is in upstream binutils to perform the related test".
And welcome any new ideas, suggestions, and completions.
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
Open, share, and attitude like air, water, and life which God blessed