[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem
From: |
Markus Armbruster |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem |
Date: |
Mon, 30 Jun 2014 13:10:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
Stefan Hajnoczi <address@hidden> writes:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:44:11AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 17/06/2014 11:03, David Marchand ha scritto:
>> >>Unless someone steps up and maintains ivshmem, I think it should be
>> >>deprecated and dropped from QEMU.
>> >
>> >Then I can maintain ivshmem for QEMU.
>> >If this is ok, I will send a patch for MAINTAINERS file.
>>
>> Typically, adding yourself to maintainers is done only after having proved
>> your ability to be a maintainer. :)
>>
>> So, let's stop talking and go back to code! You can start doing what was
>> suggested elsewhere in the thread: get the server and uio driver merged into
>> the QEMU tree, document the protocol in docs/specs/ivshmem_device_spec.txt,
>> and start fixing bugs such as the ones that Markus reported.
>
> One more thing to add to the list:
>
> static void ivshmem_read(void *opaque, const uint8_t * buf, int flags)
>
> The "flags" argument should be "size". Size should be checked before
> accessing buf.
>
> Please also see the bug fixes in the following unapplied patch:
> "[PATCH] ivshmem: fix potential OOB r/w access (#2)" by Sebastian Krahmer
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2014-04/msg03538.html
Another one: most devices can be controlled via a dedicated
CONFIG_<DEVNAME>, but not ivshmem: it uses CONFIG_KVM and CONFIG_PCI.
Giving it its own CONFIG_IVSHMEM would be nice.
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2014/06/16
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, David Marchand, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/06/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2014/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, David Marchand, 2014/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, Paolo Bonzini, 2014/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2014/06/21
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, Cam Macdonell, 2014/06/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, Andreas Färber, 2014/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, David Marchand, 2014/06/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem,
Markus Armbruster <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, Stefan Hajnoczi, 2014/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, David Marchand, 2014/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, Claudio Fontana, 2014/06/18
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, Olivier MATZ, 2014/06/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Why I advise against using ivshmem, Jobin Raju George, 2014/06/13
- Re: [Qemu-devel] Using virtio for inter-VM communication, Rusty Russell, 2014/06/11