Re: [Qemu-devel] RESEND: [PATCHv2 0/6] ui/vnc: update optimizations

[Peter Lieven]

Am 04.12.2013 19:20, schrieb Stefan Weil:
> Am 04.12.2013 18:56, schrieb Peter Lieven:
>> Ping
>>
>> Am 21.11.2013 09:51, schrieb Peter Lieven:
>>> this series includes several optimizations for the ui/vnc guest to server 
>>> and server to client
>>> update cycles. comments/reviews appreciated.
>>>
>>> v1->v2: - new patches 2,4,5
>>>         - patch3: added performance test [Anthony]
>>>         - patch3: further optimized the vnc_update_client by searching for 
>>> the next zero bit
>>>           with find_next_zero_bit.
>>>         - patch3: further optimized vnc_dpy_switch by using bitmap_set to 
>>> mask bits dirty.
>>>
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> Peter Lieven (6):
>>>   ui/vnc: introduce VNC_DIRTY_PIXELS_PER_BIT macro
>>>   ui/vnc: derive cmp_bytes from VNC_DIRTY_PIXELS_PER_BIT
>>>   ui/vnc: optimize dirty bitmap tracking
>>>   ui/vnc: optimize clearing in find_and_clear_dirty_height()
>>>   ui/vnc: optimize setting in vnc_dpy_update()
>>>   ui/vnc: disable adaptive update calculations if not needed
>>>
>>>  ui/vnc.c |  185 
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>>>  ui/vnc.h |    9 ++-
>>>  2 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
> Hallo Peter,
>
> there was an e-mail from Eric which you might consider in a 2nd version
> of your patch series.
>
> Please check also your patches using scripts/checkpatch.pl. Some of them
> currently produce warnings:
ups, i was sure to have checked this...
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 139 lines
> checked0001-ui-vnc-introduce-VNC_DIRTY_PIXELS_PER_BIT-macro.patch
>
> total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 212 lines
> checked0003-ui-vnc-optimize-dirty-bitmap-tracking.patch
>
> total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 17 lines
> checked0005-ui-vnc-optimize-setting-in-vnc_dpy_update.patch
>
> I think it would also be reasonable to fix the coding style for this
> code location in a separate patch
> before modifying the else statement, but maybe this is optional:
>
>      else
> -        w_lim = w - (w_lim % 16);
> +        w_lim = w - (w_lim % VNC_DIRTY_PIXELS_PER_BIT);
i will wait for further feedback and fix all these in v3.

Thanks,
Peter