Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V10 00/15] monitor: support sub command group in auto completion and help

[Wenchao Xia]

于 2013-8-29 22:16, Luiz Capitulino 写道:
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2013 20:38:12 +0800
> Wenchao Xia <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > This series make auto completion and help functions works normal for sub
> > command, by using reentrant functions. In order to do that, global variables
> > are not directly used in those functions any more. With this series, cmd_table
> > is a member of structure Monitor so it is possible to create a monitor with
> > different command table now, auto completion will work in that monitor. In
> > short, "info" is not treated as a special case now, this series ensure help
> > and auto complete function works normal for any sub command added in the future.
> >
> > Patch 5 replaced cur_mon with rs->mon, it is safe because:
> > monitor_init() calls readline_init() which initialize mon->rs, result is
> > mon->rs->mon == mon. Then qemu_chr_add_handlers() is called, which make
> > monitor_read() function take *mon as its opaque. Later, when user input,
> > monitor_read() is called, where cur_mon is set to *mon by "cur_mon = opaque".
> > If qemu's monitors run in one thread, then later in readline_handle_byte()
> > and readline_comletion(), cur_mon is actually equal to rs->mon, in another
> > word, it points to the monitor instance, so it is safe to replace *cur_mon
> > in those functions.
> >
> > Thanks for Luiz and Eric for reviewing.
>
> Applied to the qmp branch, thanks.
>
> Btw, I'm assuming that the patches that contain Eric's reviewed-by didn't
> change since he reviewed them. Personally, I don't think it's right to carry
> reviewed-bys when the patch changes, even if it's something small or
> obvious.
  I remember that the "Reviewed-by" were removed on all changed
patches, except:
  Patches of V7 have typo issues which were pointed
out by Eric with "Reviewed-by", for those I fixed the typo and kept the
"Reviewed by".
  Some patches were not modified but the line number may change,
since previous patch may have inserted new lines. For those I didn't
remove "Reviewed-by".
  If the above is not appropriate, I'll avoid it.

--
Best Regards

Wenchao Xia