[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] pvpanic plans?
From: |
Daniel P. Berrange |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] pvpanic plans? |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 2013 14:13:34 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 09:16:57PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 22/08/2013 19:53, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
> >> > We should just introduce a simple watchdog device based on virtio and
> >> > call it a day. Then it's cross platform, solves the guest enumeration
> >> > problem, and libvirt can detect the presence of the new device.
> > If the guest doesn't initialize the proposed virtio-panic device, then
> > it will lie dormant too, just like the current pvpanic device. That's good.
> >
> > However a new (standalone) virtio device will take up yet another PCI
> > function (a full device if you want it to be hotpluggable). PCI
> > functions are scarcer than ioports.
>
> Not just that. Panic notifiers are called in a substantially unknown
> environment, with locks taken or interrupts already set up.
>
> This is why we went for a simple ISA device. Configuration via ACPI
> follows naturally from there, and anyway any other standard of the day
> would have had the same problem with Windows. At some point we had ACPI
> methods instead of a simple ioport write, but we had to remove that
> because the ACPI subsystem might have had its lock taken.
>
> Also, a virtio watchdog device makes little sense, IMHO. PV makes sense
> if emulation has insufficient performance, excessive CPU usage, or
> excessive complexity. We already have both an ISA and a PCI watchdog,
> and they serve their purpose wonderfully.
I also don't think that panic notifiers & watchdogs are really
serving the same purpose. The panic notifier is an alert to a
specific known kernel crash. A watchdog is merely a timeout,
which is inferred to mean /something/ went wrong. Both have
their uses IMHO & we should not conflate the two.
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
- Re: [Qemu-devel] pvpanic plans?, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] pvpanic plans?, Peter Maydell, 2013/08/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] pvpanic plans?, Richard W.M. Jones, 2013/08/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] pvpanic plans?, Ronen Hod, 2013/08/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] pvpanic plans?, Richard W.M. Jones, 2013/08/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] pvpanic plans?, Anthony Liguori, 2013/08/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] pvpanic plans?, Richard W.M. Jones, 2013/08/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] pvpanic plans?,
Daniel P. Berrange <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] pvpanic plans?, Anthony Liguori, 2013/08/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [libvirt] pvpanic plans?, Richard W.M. Jones, 2013/08/27
Re: [Qemu-devel] pvpanic plans?, Laszlo Ersek, 2013/08/22