Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/7] virtio: allow byte swapping for vring and config access

[Andreas Färber]

Am 08.08.2013 17:40, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> Andreas Färber <address@hidden> writes:
>> Am 08.08.2013 15:31, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>> We have a mechanism to do weak functions via stubs/.  I think it would
>>> be better to do cpu_get_byteswap() as a stub function and then overload
>>> it in the ppc64 code.
>>
>> If this as your name indicates is a per-CPU function then it should go
>> into CPUClass. Interesting question is, what is virtio supposed to do if
>> we have two ppc CPUs, one is Big Endian, the other is Little Endian.
> 
> PPC64 is big endian.  AFAIK, there is no such thing as a little endian
> PPC64 processor.
> 
> This is just a processor mode where loads/stores are byte lane swapped.
> Hence the name 'cpu_get_byteswap'.  It's just asking whether the
> load/stores are being swapped or not.

Exactly, just read it as "is in ... Endian mode". On the CPUs I am more
familiar with (e.g., 970), this used to be controlled via an MSR bit,
which as CPUPPCState::msr exists per CPUState. I did not check on real
hardware, but from the QEMU code this would allow for the mixed-endian
scenario described above.

> At least for PPC64, it's not possible to enable/disable byte lane
> swapping for individual CPUs.  It's done through a system-wide hcall.

What is offending me is only the following: If we name it
cpu_get_byteswap() as proposed by you, then its first argument should be
a CPUState *cpu. Its value would be read from the derived type's state,
such as the MSR bit in the code path that you wanted duplicated. The
function implementing that register-reading would be a hook in CPUClass,
with a default implementation in qom/cpu.c rather than a fallback in
stubs/. To access CPUClass, CPUState cannot be NULL, as brought up by
Stefano for cpu_do_unassigned_access(); not following that pattern
prevents mixing CPU architectures, which my large refactorings have
partially been about. Cf. my guest-memory-dump refactoring.

If it is just some random global value, then please don't call it
cpu_*(). Since sPAPR is not a target of its own, I don't see how/where
you want to implement that hcall query as per-target function either,
that might rather call for a QEMUMachine hook?

I don't care or argue about byte lanes here, I am just trying to keep
API design consistent and not regressing on the way to heterogeneous
emulation.

Regards,
Andreas

> FWIW, I think most bi-endian architectures are this way too so I think
> this is equally applicable to ARM.  Peter, is that right?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori
> 
>> We'd need to check current_cpu then, which for Xen is always NULL.
>>
>> Andreas

-- 
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg