[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] pending 1.5 patches
From: |
Stefan Weil |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] pending 1.5 patches |
Date: |
Mon, 20 May 2013 17:04:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6 |
Am 20.05.2013 14:25, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Il 20/05/2013 13:28, Stefan Weil ha scritto:
>>> Am 20.05.2013 13:00, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>>>> I see the following patches on the list that IMO deserve inclusion into
>>>> 1.5. All of them should be low-risk.
>>>>
>>>> <address@hidden>
>>>> [PATCH v2] Rename hexdump to avoid FreeBSD libutil conflict
>>>>
>>>> <address@hidden>
>>>> [PATCH for-1.5 resend] vl: new runstate transition:
>>>> RUN_STATE_GUEST_PANICKED -> RUN_STATE_FINISH_MIGRATE
>>>>
>>>> <address@hidden>
>>>> [PATCH for-1.5] osdep: fix qemu_anon_ram_free trace (+ fix compilation
>>>> on 32 bit hosts)
>>> See also http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/244757/
>> Yes, they are identical.
>>
>>>> <address@hidden>
>>>> [PATCH 1/3] chardev: Make consistent with udp device for new qapi backend
>>>> (not the rest of the series)
>>>>
>>>> There is also <address@hidden>, but I think it's
>>>> too intrusive.
>>> Plus this one, please:
>>>
>>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/244758/
>>> spitz: Fix compiler warning (MinGW-w64)
>> Agreed.
> We don't build with -Werror on MinGW-w64 so a warning fix is very low
> priority. It needs to wait for stable.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori
I don't mind waiting. For your information: MinGW-w64
normally should compile without warnings when a recent
set of MinGW-w64 include files is used.
Please don't forget http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/244757/
_before_ Paolo's list.
Thanks,
Stefan Weil