[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp
From: |
Bob Breuer |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:20:08 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) |
Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
>> I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following
>> patch, then I at least get the openbios messages:
>>
>> diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
>> index a9fa608..dfbd6ea 100644
>> --- a/cpu-exec.c
>> +++ b/cpu-exec.c
>> @@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ static void cpu_handle_debug_exception(CPUState
>> /* main execution loop */
>>
>> volatile sig_atomic_t exit_request;
>> +register void *ebp asm("ebp");
>>
>> int cpu_exec(CPUState *env)
>> {
>> @@ -233,6 +234,8 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUState *env)
>>
>> /* prepare setjmp context for exception handling */
>> for(;;) {
>> + int dummy = 0;
>> + ebp = &dummy;
>
> See if
>
> asm("" : : : "ebp");
>
> also solves the problem.
No, that doesn't fix it.
>
>> Google finds a mention of longjmp failing with -fomit-frame-pointer:
>> http://lua-users.org/lists/lua-l/2005-02/msg00158.html
>>
>> Looks like gcc 4.6 turns on -fomit-frame-pointer by default.
>
> Hmm. This is the first I've heard of a longjmp implementation
> failing without a frame pointer. Presumably this is with the
> mingw i.e. msvc libc?
Yeah, mingw from www.mingw.org which I believe uses msvcrt.dll, package
gcc-core-4.6.1-2-mingw32-bin.
> This is something that could be worked around in gcc, I suppose.
> We recognize longjmp for some things, we could force the use of
> a frame pointer for msvc targets too.
>
> For now it might be best to simply force -fno-omit-frame-pointer
> for mingw host in the configure script.
Here's a testcase that crashes on the longjmp:
#include <stdio.h>
#include <setjmp.h>
jmp_buf env;
int test(void)
{
int i;
asm("xor %%ebp,%%ebp" ::: "ebp");
i = setjmp(env);
printf("i = %d\n", i);
if (i == 0)
longjmp(env, 2);
return i;
}
int main(void)
{
return test();
}
Remove the asm statement to make it not crash. Obviously with
omit-frame-pointer, gcc can shove anything into ebp.
Bob
- [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc io-thread segfault on win32, Bob Breuer, 2011/10/17
- Message not available
- Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc io-thread segfault on win32, Bob Breuer, 2011/10/17
- [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp, Richard Henderson, 2011/10/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp, Blue Swirl, 2011/10/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp, Richard Henderson, 2011/10/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp,
Bob Breuer <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp, Kai Tietz, 2011/10/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp, Bob Breuer, 2011/10/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp, Kai Tietz, 2011/10/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp, Bob Breuer, 2011/10/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp, Richard Henderson, 2011/10/19
- Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp, xunxun, 2011/10/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp, Kai Tietz, 2011/10/20
- Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp, Kai Tietz, 2011/10/20
- Message not available
- Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp, xunxun, 2011/10/22
- Re: [Qemu-devel] gcc auto-omit-frame-pointer vs msvc longjmp, xunxun, 2011/10/22