[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device
From: |
David Gibson |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Sep 2011 18:46:47 +1000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:34:52PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 12:04 +0200, Alexander Graf wrote:
> > Am 26.09.2011 um 09:51 schrieb David Gibson <address@hidden>:
[snip]
> > Also, if you can come up with an interface that does not have variable
> > length descriptors but is still able to export all the required
> > generic information, please send a proposal to the list :)
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> The other obvious possibility is a pure ioctl interface. To match what
> this proposal is trying to describe, plus the runtime interfaces, we'd
> need something like:
Right, this also seems a reasonable possibility to me, depending on
the details.
> /* :0 - PCI devices, :1 - Devices path device, 63:2 - reserved */
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_FLAGS _IOR(, , u64)
>
>
> /* Return number of mmio/iop/config regions.
> * For PCI this is always 8 (BAR0-5 + ROM + Config) */
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_NUM_REGIONS _IOR(, , int)
>
> /* Return length for region index (may be zero) */
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_LEN _IOWR(, , u64)
>
> /* Return flags for region index
> * :0 - mmap'able, :1 - read-only, 63:2 - reserved */
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_FLAGS _IOR(, , u64)
>
> /* Return file offset for region index */
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_OFFSET _IOWR(, , u64)
The above 3 can be be folded into one "getregioninfo" call.
> /* Return physical address for region index - not implemented for PCI */
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_REGION_PHYS_ADDR _IOWR(, , u64)
>
>
>
> /* Return number of IRQs (Not including MSI/MSI-X for PCI) */
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_NUM_IRQ _IOR(, , int)
>
> /* Set IRQ eventfd for IRQ index, arg[0] = index, arg[1] = fd */
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_SET_IRQ_EVENTFD _IOW(, , int)
>
> /* Unmask IRQ index */
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_UNMASK_IRQ _IOW(, , int)
>
> /* Set unmask eventfd for index, arg[0] = index, arg[1] = fd */
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_SET_UNMASK_IRQ_EVENTFD _IOW(, , int)
>
>
> /* Return the device tree path for type/index into the user
> * allocated buffer */
> struct dtpath {
> u32 type; (0 = region, 1 = IRQ)
> u32 index;
> u32 buf_len;
> char *buf;
> };
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_DTPATH _IOWR(, , struct dtpath)
>
> /* Return the device tree index for type/index */
> struct dtindex {
> u32 type; (0 = region, 1 = IRQ)
> u32 index;
> u32 prop_type;
> u32 prop_index;
> };
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_GET_DTINDEX _IOWR(, , struct
> dtindex)
I think those need some work, but that doesn't impinge on the core
semantics.
> /* Reset the device */
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_RESET _IO(, ,)
>
>
> /* PCI MSI setup, arg[0] = #, arg[1-n] = eventfds */
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_SET_MSI_EVENTFDS _IOW(, , int)
> #define VFIO_DEVICE_PCI_SET_MSIX_EVENTFDS _IOW(, , int)
Why does this need seperate controls, rather than just treating MSIs
as interrupts beyond the first for PCI devices?
> Hope that covers it. Something I prefer about this interface is that
> everything can easily be generated on the fly, whereas reading out a
> table from the device means we really need to have that table somewhere
> in kernel memory to easily support reading random offsets.
> Thoughts?
I certainly prefer it to the previous proposal.
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files, (continued)
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files, Scott Wood, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files, Alex Williamson, 2011/09/26
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files, Scott Wood, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files, Alex Williamson, 2011/09/27
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files, Alexander Graf, 2011/09/28
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files, David Gibson, 2011/09/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files, David Gibson, 2011/09/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files,
David Gibson <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files, Alex Williamson, 2011/09/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files, Alex Williamson, 2011/09/30
- Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files, David Gibson, 2011/09/30
Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC [v2]: vfio / device assignment -- layout of device fd files, Stuart Yoder, 2011/09/26