|
From: | Anthony Liguori |
Subject: | Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Use qemu_eventfd for POSIX AIO |
Date: | Tue, 27 Sep 2011 09:38:25 -0500 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
On 09/27/2011 09:22 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2011-09-27 16:19, Anthony Liguori wrote:On 09/27/2011 09:11 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:On 09/27/2011 05:07 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:You don't expect to handle EAGAIN with eventfd() whereas you have to handle it with pipe(). Moreover, the eventfd() counter is not lossy (practically speaking) whereas if you use pipe() as a counter, it will be lossy in practice. This is why posix aio uses pipe() and not eventfd().We could define a qemu_event mechanism that satisfies the least common denominator, and is implemented by eventfd when available. qemu_event_create() qemu_event_signal() qemu_event_wait() qemu_event_poll_add() // registers in main loop qemu_event_poll_del()See hw/event_notifier.[ch].That code looks suspicious, btw. It claims things ("we use EFD_SEMAPHORE") it does not do.
Indeed. But the interface appears to be the right one IMHO. Regards, Anthony Liguori
Jan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |