[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu] e1000: CTRL.RST emulation
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH qemu] e1000: CTRL.RST emulation |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2011 15:32:53 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 12:50:21PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 27 September 2011 12:25, Michael S. Tsirkin <address@hidden> wrote:
> > e1000 spec says CTRL.RST write should have the same effect
> > as bus reset, except that is preserves PCI Config.
> > Reset device registers and interrupts.
> >
> > Fix suggested by Andy Gospodarek <address@hidden>
>
> Doesn't this have the same effect as this patch:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/108673/
Right except mine clears the interrupts as well.
I missed that patch - what happened to it in the end?
> except that it's harder to read because it's moved a lot
> of code around in the file?
>
> (I think you have an extra qemu_set_irq() call in there,
The device spec says we should reset the interrupts.
So it seems necessary.
> actually. But it was hard to find.
I probably should split the patch out
1. code movement
2. code change
Forward declarations just to work around random
placement of functions in file seem wrong -
why not order the functions sensibly instead?
> Also your code has the
> bug that was in earlier revisions of Anthony's patch where
> after doing the reset you fall through and allow other bits
> in the ctrl register to be set.)
>
> -- PMM
True.
--
MST