[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/t
|
From: |
Michael S. Tsirkin |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap |
|
Date: |
Sat, 17 Sep 2011 22:17:09 +0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Sat, Sep 17, 2011 at 02:02:04PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> A wiki-page was created to narrate the detail design of all parts
> involved in the multi queue implementation:
> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue and some basic tests result
> could be seen in this page
> http://www.linux-kvm.org/page/Multiqueue-performance-Sep-13. I would
> post the detail numbers in attachment as the reply of this thread.
Does it make sense to test both with and without RPS in guest?
--
MST
- [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap, Jason Wang, 2011/09/17
- [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 1/5] tuntap: move socket to tun_file, Jason Wang, 2011/09/17
- [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 2/5] tuntap: categorize ioctl, Jason Wang, 2011/09/17
- [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 3/5] tuntap: introduce multiqueue flags, Jason Wang, 2011/09/17
- [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 4/5] tuntap: multiqueue support, Jason Wang, 2011/09/17
- [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 5/5] tuntap: add ioctls to attach or detach a file form tap device, Jason Wang, 2011/09/17
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap,
Michael S. Tsirkin <=
- Re: [Qemu-devel] [net-next RFC V2 PATCH 0/5] Multiqueue support in tun/tap, Ben Hutchings, 2011/09/19